Wal-Mart class action

Law review article draft on certification issues, pointing out circuit split that could give Wal-Mart a shot at getting heard by Supreme Court

Investor perspective

Detailed summary of opinion.

Brief summary of opinion.

"Still, it's a notable victory and a sign that Wal-Mart may eventually be forced to clean up its act - since it won't do so on its own."

Never mind that Wal-Mart is making many changes in response to public pressures, including this suit.  This isn't about them changing -- its about lawyers getting filthy rich.

Ecellent legal critique.

Typical MSM coverage.  Ends on interesting note:

"However, the news seems to have had little impact on the Wal-Mart shares as it closed 6 cents higher on Tuesday at $48.58 on the New York Stock Exchange."

Good legal critique; hits several less-noticed side-points

Lighthearted interview with plaintiff's attorney in the case. 

Question I'd ask: So if your "goal is to improve them" (defendant companies), would you consider a settlement that provided for nonmonetary relief only (detailed, systematic reforms) and attorneys' fees calculated by the judge under the "prevailing party" lodestar formula?