<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"Knowledge - brave new world" by chennaidoc</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/chennaidoc/trails/16689</link><category>chennaidoc/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>The Truth About Homework - Mozilla Firefox</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/chennaidoc/marks/24435</link><description><![CDATA[Homework continues to be assigned – in ever greater quantities – despite the absence of evidence that it’s necessary or even helpful in most cases. Supporters of homework rarely look at things from the student’s point of view, though; instead, kids are regarded as inert objects to be acted on: Make them practice and they’ll get better. My argument isn’t just that this viewpoint is disrespectful, or that it’s a residue of an outdated stimulus-response psychology. I’m also suggesting it’s counterproductive. Children cannot be made to acquire skills. They aren’t vending machines such that we put in more homework and get out more learning.]]></description><category>Knowledge - brave new world</category><author>chennaidoc</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:16:42 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:24435</guid></item><item><title>The Chronicle: 10/27/2006: Can Wikipedia Ever Make the Grade? - ...</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/chennaidoc/marks/24441</link><description><![CDATA[Among academics, however, Wikipedia continues to receive mixed — and often failing — grades. Wikipedia&#39;s supporters often portray the site as a brave new world in which scholars can rub elbows with the general public. But doubters of the approach — and in academe, there are many — say Wikipedia devalues the notion of expertise itself.]]></description><category>Knowledge - brave new world</category><author>chennaidoc</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:32:19 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:24441</guid></item><item><title>Edge; DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism...</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/chennaidoc/marks/24685</link><description><![CDATA[The beauty of the Internet is that it connects people. The value is in the other people. If we start to believe that the Internet itself is an entity that has something to say, we&#39;re devaluing those people and making ourselves into idiots. ...writing professionally and well takes time and that most authors need to be paid to take that time. In this regard, blogging is not writing. For example, it&#39;s easy to be loved as a blogger. All you have to do is play to the crowd. Or you can flame the crowd to get attention. Nothing is wrong with either of those activities. What I think of as real writing, however, writing meant to last, is something else. It involves articulating a perspective that is not just reactive to yesterday&#39;s moves in a conversation. What we are witnessing today is the alarming rise of the fallacy of the infallible collective. What I&#39;ve seen is a loss of insight and subtlety, a disregard for the nuances of considered opinions, and an increased tendency to enshrine the official or normative beliefs of an organization. Why isn&#39;t everyone screaming about the recent epidemic of inappropriate uses of the collective? It seems to me the reason is that bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology.]]></description><category>Knowledge - brave new world</category><author>chennaidoc</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:31:59 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:24685</guid></item><item><title>New Citizendium to correct Wikipedia's wrongs? - Mozilla Firefox</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/chennaidoc/marks/24442</link><description><![CDATA[Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is starting a Wikipedia competitor.Citzendium is being created to &quot;outdo&quot; Wikipedia. How? The big difference between Citizendium and Wikipedia will be the presence of &quot;experts&quot; on Citizendium who will have the final say in editing disputes.]]></description><category>Knowledge - brave new world</category><author>chennaidoc</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:31:53 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:24442</guid></item></channel></rss>
