http://www.trailfire.com/huskyrugby/trails/23756huskyrugby/trails60http://www.trailfire.com/huskyrugby/marks/46480ZDNet's Phil Wainwright thinks this issue, namely lack of revenue, is a big piece that's missing from the Web 2.0 business model. He posits that the next iteration of Web 2.0 will solve this and other problems, which he dubs Web 3.0.  Phil's analysis is pretty sharp and he has identified at least three revenue models that will form the basis of commercial succesful Web 2.0 services:]]>How To Monetize Web 2.0huskyrugbyWed, 24 Jan 2007 13:57:01 -0800trailfire:markId:46480http://www.trailfire.com/huskyrugby/marks/46483notes, you're also getting the good feeling of contributing to something worthwhile, the benefit of attention by admirers or even the attention of potential paying customers. All good stuff, maybe better than the relative pittance you'd probably get from any kind of revenue sharing.]]>How To Monetize Web 2.0huskyrugbyWed, 24 Jan 2007 14:00:43 -0800trailfire:markId:46483http://www.trailfire.com/huskyrugby/marks/46485the desire to show off.]]>How To Monetize Web 2.0huskyrugbyWed, 24 Jan 2007 14:01:56 -0800trailfire:markId:46485http://www.trailfire.com/huskyrugby/marks/46487The whole subject of making money with web 2.0 is quite critical. Ironically, a couple of weeks before, when I spoke at Seoul on Mobile web 2.0, I remarked that: If I ever got a dollar every time I was asked the question: ‘Is there money in web 2.0’? I would not need a revenue model myselves! But sadly, I don’t get a dollar each time .. :(

]]>How To Monetize Web 2.0huskyrugbyWed, 24 Jan 2007 14:03:24 -0800trailfire:markId:46487