<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"Wal-Mart class action" by georgel314</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/trails/26144</link><category>georgel314/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>23(B)(2) Class Certification: Choosing an Approach for Certifying Civil Rights Discrimination Class Action Suits</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54073</link><description><![CDATA[Law review article draft on certification issues, pointing out circuit split that could give Wal-Mart a shot at getting heard by Supreme Court<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:06:18 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54073</guid></item><item><title>Monty's Bluff</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54251</link><description><![CDATA[Investor perspective<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:13:39 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54251</guid></item><item><title>Dukes v. Wal-Mart Class Action Defense Case: Ninth Circuit Upholds Certification Of Nationwide Sex Discrimination Class Action Creating Largest Class Ever Agreeing With District Court That Class Action Was Nonetheless Manageable - Class Action Defense Blog</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54252</link><description><![CDATA[Detailed summary of opinion.<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:14:24 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54252</guid></item><item><title>Wal-Mart class action approved - Ross' Employment Law Blog</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54255</link><description><![CDATA[Brief summary of opinion.<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:21:53 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54255</guid></item><item><title>Northwest Progressive Institute: Wal-Mart facing class action discrimination suit</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54256</link><description><![CDATA[&quot;Still, it&#39;s a notable victory and a sign that Wal-Mart may eventually be forced to clean up its act - since it won&#39;t do so on its own.&quot;<BR><BR>Never mind that Wal-Mart is making many changes in response to public pressures, including this suit.&nbsp; This isn&#39;t about them changing -- its about lawyers getting filthy rich.<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:23:28 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54256</guid></item><item><title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Wal-Mart class affirmed by Ninth Circuit, 2-1</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54257</link><description><![CDATA[Ecellent legal critique.<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:24:47 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54257</guid></item><item><title>Historic sex bias case hits Wal-Mart hard - Women Lifestyle</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54258</link><description><![CDATA[Typical MSM coverage.&nbsp; Ends on interesting note:<BR><BR>&quot;However, the news seems to have had little impact on the Wal-Mart shares as it closed 6 cents higher on Tuesday at $48.58 on the New York Stock Exchange.&quot;]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:26:36 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54258</guid></item><item><title>Cal Biz Lit: Daubert Meets Wal-Mart, and Other Observations on Today&amp;rsquo;s Decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54259</link><description><![CDATA[Good legal critique; hits several less-noticed side-points<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:28:01 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54259</guid></item><item><title>Law Blog - WSJ.com : Law Blog Lawyer of the Day: Brad Seligman</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/georgel314/marks/54268</link><description><![CDATA[Lighthearted interview with plaintiff&#39;s attorney in the case.&nbsp;<BR><BR>Question I&#39;d ask: So if your &quot;goal is to improve them&quot; (defendant companies), would you consider a settlement that provided for nonmonetary relief only (detailed, systematic reforms) and attorneys&#39; fees calculated by the judge under the &quot;prevailing party&quot; lodestar formula?<BR>]]></description><category>Wal-Mart class action</category><author>georgel314</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:08:16 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:54268</guid></item></channel></rss>
