<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"invest" by enjoylife</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/trails/60498</link><category>enjoylife/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>TechCrunch</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/212245</link><description><![CDATA[MarketGuru’s concept has promise but the site is entering a space with a number competitors who provide very similar offerings. These include <A HREF="http://www.covestor.com">Covestor<IMG SRC="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.28/t.gif" STYLE="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt ! important; padding: 1px 0pt 0pt; max-height: 2000px; max-width: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;" CLASS="snap_preview_icon" ID="snap_com_shot_link_icon"></A>, <A HREF="http://www.cakefinancial.com">CakeFinancial<IMG SRC="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.28/t.gif" STYLE="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt ! important; padding: 1px 0pt 0pt; max-height: 2000px; max-width: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;" CLASS="snap_preview_icon" ID="snap_com_shot_link_icon"></A>, <A HREF="http://www.socialpicks.com">SocialPicks<IMG SRC="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.28/t.gif" STYLE="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt ! important; padding: 1px 0pt 0pt; max-height: 2000px; max-width: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;" CLASS="snap_preview_icon" ID="snap_com_shot_link_icon"></A>, and <A HREF="http://www.mint.com">Mint<IMG SRC="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.28/t.gif" STYLE="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt ! important; padding: 1px 0pt 0pt; max-height: 2000px; max-width: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;" CLASS="snap_preview_icon" ID="snap_com_shot_link_icon"></A>, which has just introducing <A HREF="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/mint-moves-into-investment-tracking/">investment tracking</A>. That said, the social investment space can certainly support more than a few competitors, so MarketGuru has a fighting chance (especially with people who don’t actually want to play with real money).]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:44:09 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:212245</guid></item><item><title>The 5 Top-Rated ETFs</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/223360</link><description><![CDATA[<P><STRONG>Your top picks<BR></STRONG>Here are the top five ETFs as <A HREF="http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2007/04/27/the-caps-stock-rating.aspx">rated</A> by CAPS investors:</P><TABLE CLASS="ed-table" CELLSPACING=""><TBODY><TR><TH><P ALIGN="center"><STRONG>ETF Name</STRONG></P></TH><TH><P ALIGN="center"><STRONG>Overall CAPS Rank</STRONG></P></TH><TH><P ALIGN="center"><STRONG>Notable Top Holdings</STRONG></P></TH></TR><TR><TD><P><STRONG>Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth</STRONG> (VOT)</P></TD><TD><P>2</P></TD><TD><P><STRONG>MEMC Electronic Materials</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/WFR.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">WFR</A>)</SPAN>, <STRONG>T Rowe Price Group</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(Nasdaq: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/TROW.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">TROW</A>)</SPAN>, <STRONG>Noble</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/NE.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">NE</A>)</SPAN></P></TD></TR><TR><TD><P><STRONG>PIMCO Floating Rate Strategy</STRONG> (PFN)</P></TD><TD><P>3</P></TD><TD><P><STRONG>N/A</STRONG></P></TD></TR><TR><TD><P><STRONG>ING Global Equity Dividend &amp; Premium Opportunity</STRONG> (IGD)</P></TD><TD><P>5</P></TD><TD><P><STRONG>Fortis, AT&amp;T</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/T.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">T</A>)</SPAN>, <STRONG>US Bancorp</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/USB.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">USB</A>)</SPAN></P></TD></TR><TR><TD><P><STRONG>SPDR DJ Wilshire Small Cap Value</STRONG> (DSV)</P></TD><TD><P>7</P></TD><TD><P><STRONG>Ryder System,</STRONG> <STRONG>Commercial Metals Company,</STRONG> <STRONG>Hanesbrands</STRONG></P></TD></TR><TR><TD><P><STRONG>John Hancock Tax-Advantage Dividend Income</STRONG> (HTD)</P></TD><TD><P>12</P></TD><TD><P><STRONG>ONEOK</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/OKE.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">OKE</A>)</SPAN>, <STRONG>NSTAR</STRONG> <SPAN CLASS="ticker">(NYSE: <A CLASS="qsAdd qs-source-icaedilnk9950012" HREF="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/NST.aspx?source=icaedilnk9950012">NST</A>)</SPAN>, <STRONG>Dominion Resources</STRONG></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><P><SPAN CLASS="smalltext">Source: Motley Fool CAPS, as of June 6, and Morningstar.</SPAN></P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:44:09 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:223360</guid></item><item><title>ETF Performance Reports | ETF Trends</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/224259</link><description><![CDATA[<P>The strongest ETFs for the month were:</P><UL><LI><STRONG>Market Vectors Russia (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=rsx" TARGET="_blank">RSX</A>)</STRONG>, up 17.6%</LI><LI><STRONG>SPDR S&amp;P Metals &amp; Mining (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=xme" TARGET="_blank">XME</A>)</STRONG>, up 14.9%</LI><LI><STRONG>United States Gasoline (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=uga" TARGET="_blank">UGA</A>)</STRONG>, up 14.6%</LI></UL><P><A HREF="http://www.etftrends.com/files/05-30-08ETFReport.pdf">Click here</A> to review the full ETF performance report.</P><BR><P><BR></P><P>IYM: US Basic Materials&nbsp;&nbsp; +20%</P><P><STRONG>iShares GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gsg">GSG</A>):</STRONG> natural resources; up 31.8% year-to-date</P><P>PHO Water Resources 22.57 0.9% 4.9% 2.7% 24.0%<BR></P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:57:41 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:224259</guid></item><item><title>ETFConnect - Fund Sorter</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/224261</link><description><![CDATA[<TABLE BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD STYLE="padding-right: 10px;"><TABLE ID="Table3" BGCOLOR="#F5F2EB" BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD STYLE="padding-left: 4px; padding-top: 4px; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold;" COLSPAN="2">Ordered By Total YTD Market Return</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2"><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="12" WIDTH="1"></TD></TR><TR><TD STYLE="padding-top: 8px; padding-left: 4px;">Funds 1 to 25 of 639</TD><TD ALIGN="right"><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="10"></TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2"><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="8" WIDTH="1"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD STYLE="padding-right: 10px;"><TABLE ID="Table4" STYLE="background-image: none;" CLASS="callout" BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR HEIGHT="26"><TD VALIGN="bottom"><B>Fund Name</B></TD><TD VALIGN="bottom">&nbsp;<B><B>Ticker</B>&nbsp;</B></TD><TD ALIGN="right" VALIGN="bottom"><B>Total YTD Market Return</B>&nbsp;</TD><TD STYLE="vertical-align: top; text-align: right; padding-left: 2px; padding-right: 4px;"><B><NOBR>As Of Date</NOBR></B></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176653">United States Natural Gas Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176653">UNG</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">53.46%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181771">iPath Dow Jones-AIG Natural Gas Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181771">GAZ</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">52.65%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=44841">HOLDRS B2B Internet</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=44841">BHH</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">42.86%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181786">iPath Dow Jones AIG Energy Total Return Sub-Index ETN</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181786">JJE</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">41.31%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=172271">PowerShares DB Energy Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=172271">DBE</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">40.48%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181803">ELEMENTS Rogers International Commodity Index Energy</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=181803">RJN</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">38.00%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=172330">PowerShares DB Oil Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=172330">DBO</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">36.56%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176785">iPath S&amp;P GSCI Crude Oil Total Return Index ETN</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176785">OIL</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">36.11%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=159102">United States Oil Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=159102">USO</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">36.03%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176783">First Trust ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176783">FCG</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">32.64%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176787">iPath S&amp;P GSCI Total Return Index ETN</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176787">GSP</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">29.65%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=170373">MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Shares</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=170373">UCR</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">29.42%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=163007">iShares S&amp;P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=163007">GSG</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">28.74%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=153467">PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=153467">DBC</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">28.49%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=169358">Market Vectors Steel Index ETF Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=169358">SLX</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">27.45%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162386">SPDR S&amp;P Metals &amp; Mining ETF</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162386">XME</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">26.86%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162388">SPDR S&amp;P Oil &amp; Gas Exploration &amp; Production ETF</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162388">XOP</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">24.62%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=178948">Claymore/SWM Canadian Energy Income Index ETF</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=178948">ENY</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">23.28%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=48802">iShares MSCI Brazil Index Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=48802">EWZ</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">22.97%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=160298">iShares DJ US Oil &amp; Gas Exp &amp; Pro</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=160298">IEO</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">22.38%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176681">First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=176681">FXN</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">21.05%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=78839">iShares S&amp;P Latin American 40 Index Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=78839">ILF</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">20.75%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=119373">iShares Dow Jones Transportation Average Index Fund</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=119373">IYT</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">19.97%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=170027">SPDR S&amp;P Emerging Latin America ETF</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=170027">GML</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">18.94%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR><TR STYLE="background-color: rgb(238, 244, 251);"><TD><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162387">SPDR S&amp;P Oil &amp; Gas Equipment &amp; Services ETF</A></TD><TD><IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"><A HREF="/procPages/procNextPage.asp?MFID=162387">XES</A></TD><TD ALIGN="right">18.61%&nbsp;</TD><TD ALIGN="right">5/31/2008<IMG SRC="/images/spacer.gif" BORDER="" HEIGHT="1" WIDTH="5"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:01:40 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:224261</guid></item><item><title>ETF Investing for Rainy Days - TheStreet.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/224605</link><description><![CDATA[<P><B>1) Buy Coal</B>.</P><P>The recent surge in coal prices is just the beginning of a longer-term cycle uptrend for coal. The global use of coal is rising while coal stockpiles are falling pushing coal prices higher.</P><P><A HREF="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10419285/1/glowing-prospects-in-the-cola-sector.html">As I suggested last week</A>, the fastest way to invest in this price action is through the <B>Market Vectors Coal ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="KOL">KOL</SPAN>, a 39-stock fund that invests in the coal industry worldwide.</P><P><B>2) Short Financials</B>.</P><P>In every economic cycle downturn, major financial institutions experience significant credit losses and have a capital shortage. Earlier this week, <B>Lehman Brothers</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="LEH">LEH</SPAN> was able to raise $6 billion in equity -- but the markets are not always so kind, especially with smaller firms.</P><P>The primary ETF for shorting the U.S. financial sector is <B>ProShares Ultra Short Financials</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="SKF">SKF</SPAN>. (Keep in mind, the &quot;Ultra&quot; in the name means it&#39;s leveraged, which adds risk.)</P><P>If you think more write-offs are coming or that <B>American International Group</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="AIG">AIG</SPAN> and other financials stocks are headed lower, this is the ETF for you.</P><P><B>3) Maintain Material Investments</B>.</P><P>The best-performing holdings in the portfolio last quarter were <B>ProShares Ultra Basic Materials</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="UYM">UYM</SPAN> and the <B>S&amp;P Metals and Mining ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="XME">XME</SPAN>. These were up 27% for the three-month period. This performance was driven by rising prices for steel and coal. Expect this to continue and drive materials and mining stocks higher over the coming quarters.</P><P>My favorite steel stock remains <B>Gerdau</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="GGB">GGB</SPAN>, which is a top-10 holding in <B>Market Vectors Steel ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="SLX">SLX</SPAN>, which did so well last quarter. In addition to being a cyclical materials beneficiary, Gerdau will benefit from last month&#39;s creation of the Union of South America Nations.</P><P><B>4) Explore the Oil Patch</B>.</P><P>Three ETFs make the grade here.</P><P>The first is <B>PowerShares Dynamic Oil &amp; Gas Services Portfolio</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="PXJ">PXJ</SPAN>, which holds oil-service stocks such as <B>McDermott</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="MDR">MDR</SPAN>, <B>Halliburton</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="HAL">HAL</SPAN> and my favorite drill-rig stock, <B>Noble</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="NE">NE</SPAN>. The market has never looked so good for oil-service companies. The second is the <B>S&amp;P Oil and Gas Exploration and Production ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="XOP">XOP</SPAN>. The top two holdings are two shale oil stocks, <B>PetroHawk</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="HK">HK</SPAN> and <B>Encore Acquisition</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="EAC">EAC</SPAN>.</P><P>The third is the <B>ProShares Oil and Gas</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="DIG">DIG</SPAN>, which is a concentrated play on traditional big-oil stocks.</P><P><B>5) Reconsider Russia</B>.</P><P>Russia&#39;s new President Medvedev plans to turn Moscow into a global financial center and to make the ruble a leading regional reserve currency.</P><P>Fast-growing companies <B>Gazprom</B> and <B>Rosneft</B> are among the top five holdings in <B>Market Vectors TR Russia ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="RSX">RSX</SPAN>. Over the last year this ETF has gained 56%, but looks to have still more upside potential with 36% of the portfolio in oil and gas, and another 26% of its investments in iron and steel products.</P><P><B>6) Short China in the Short-Term</B>.</P><P>Be careful with this one.</P><P>If you are sour on emerging markets, try <B>ProShares UltraShort FTSE/Xinhua China 25</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="FXP">FXP</SPAN>. The recent natural disasters and expectations for slowing growth might make this a good time to place a short-term bet before the Olympics. Slower growth may be good longer-term for the economy but is likely to hurt stock investors expecting fast money near-term.</P><P>Things are not so rosy out East in general. The <B>DB X-TRACKERS FTSE VIETNAM ETF</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="XFVT">XFVT</SPAN> dropped 30% last month, posting a 58% loss since its inception in February. Inflation fears, a currency crisis and IPO delays are scaring foreign investors from this once-buoyant market.</P><P><B>7) Nuclear.</B></P><P>As the world looks to cut its reliance on oil and coal and curb carbon dioxide emissions, some of the best-performing stocks of the next 12 to 18 months may be in the global nuclear sector.</P><P>The <B>Market Vectors Nuclear Fund</B><SPAN CLASS="TICKERFLAT" ID="NLR">NLR</SPAN> is a global fund that invests in the nuclear energy business. Only 29% of this fund is in U.S. stocks, with another 26% from Japan and 24% from Canada. Three leading investments represent 30% of the fund: <B>Electricite de France</B>, <B>British Energy Group</B> and <B>Mitsubishi Heavy Industries</B>.</P><P>The regulatory environment for nuclear power is improving. China is planning to build 30 new nuclear reactors over the next 13 years. Last month, Italy lifted a 20-year moratorium on nuclear-power stations. Even in the U.S., several state legislatures are considering bills to lift the ban on nuclear power.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:47:31 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:224605</guid></item><item><title>Actively Managed | ETF Trends</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/224836</link><description><![CDATA[<P>The active ETFs currently available are:</P><UL><LI><STRONG>PowerShares Active Low Duration Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=plk">PLK</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>PowerShares Active Mega Cap Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=pma">PMA</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>PowerShares Active Alpha Q Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=pqy">PQY</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>PowerShares Active Alpha Multi-Cap Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=pqz">PQZ</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>WisdomTree Dreyfus Chinese Yuan Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=cyb">CYB</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>WisdomTree Dreyfus Indian Rupee Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=icn">ICN</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>WisdomTree Dreyfus Brazilian Real Fund (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=bzf">BZF</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>WisdomTree Dreyfus Euro Fund (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=eu" TARGET="_blank">EU</A>)</STRONG></LI><LI><STRONG>Bear Stearns Current Yield (<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=yyy">YYY</A>)</STRONG></LI></UL>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:14:33 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:224836</guid></item><item><title>V4Vendetta&amp;#039;s Guru Page | MarketGuru Investor Community</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/225387</link><description><![CDATA[<P><A TITLE="Barclays Bank PLC iPath Exchange Traded Notes due June 12 2036 Linked to GSCI T" CLASS="fat" HREF="http://www.marketguru.com/stocks/GSP">GSP</A></P><SPAN CLASS="stockName">Barclays Bank PLC iPath Exchange Traded Notes due June 12 2036 Linked to GSCI T</SPAN>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:04:08 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:225387</guid></item><item><title>Advanced Futures Inc.: E-mini S&amp;amp;P 500</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/225399</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:40:52 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:225399</guid></item><item><title>Advanced Futures Inc.: E-mini S&amp;amp;P 500</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/225400</link><description><![CDATA[<DL><DT><SPAN CLASS="mainbody"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="2"><B>E-Mini Contract Specifications</B> [<A HREF="#top">top</A>]</FONT></SPAN></DT></DL><TABLE ALIGN="center" BORDER="" CELLPADDING="5" CELLSPACING="1" WIDTH="90%"><TBODY><TR BGCOLOR="#41588C" VALIGN="top"><TD><SPAN CLASS="mainbody"><FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN></TD><TD ALIGN="center"><B><FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">E-mini S&amp;P 500</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center"><B><FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">E-mini Nasdaq-100</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center"><B><FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">E-mini Russell 2000</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center"><B><FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">E-mini S&amp;P Mid Cap 400</FONT></B></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Ticker Symbol</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">ES</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">NA</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">ER2</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">EMD</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Contract Size</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$50 x E-mini S&amp;P Futures price<BR>$55,000</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">20 x E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures price<BR>$30,000</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$100 x E-mini Russell 2000 Futures price<BR>$49,000</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$100 x E-mini Mid Cap 400 Futures price<BR>$55,000</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Min. Price Fluctuation (Tick)</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">.25 futures index points = $12.50</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">.50 futures index points = $10.00</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">.10 futures index points = $10.00</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">.10 futures index points = $10.00</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Trading Hours</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Virtually</FONT> <FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">24 Hours</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Virtually 24 Hours</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Virtually 24 Hours</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Virtually 24 Hours</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Contract Months*</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">H, M, U, Z</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">H, M, U, Z</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">H, M, U, Z</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">H, M, U, Z</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Last Day of Trading</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">8:30AM 3rd Friday of contract month</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">8:30AM 3rd Friday of contract month</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">8:30AM 3rd Friday of contract month</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">8:30AM 3rd Friday of contract month</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Performance Bond Initial **</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$3,938</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$4,125</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$4,350</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$3,125</FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD BGCOLOR="#CCCCCC"><B><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">Performance Bond Maint.</FONT></B></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$3,150</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$3,300</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$3,480</FONT></TD><TD ALIGN="center" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEB" VALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">$2,500</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><DL><DD><SPAN CLASS="mainbody"><B><FONT COLOR="#666666" FACE="Arial" SIZE="1">*H=March, M=June, U=Sept, Z=Dec<BR>** CME minimum performance bond margins as of 1/31/02 SUBJECT TO CHANGE</FONT></B></SPAN></DD><DT>&nbsp;</DT><DT><SPAN CLASS="mainbody"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="2"><B><A NAME="sp"><BR>What is 1 point of the E-mini S&amp;P 500 worth?</A></B> <A NAME="sp">[</A><A HREF="#top">top</A>]</FONT></SPAN></DT><DD><SPAN CLASS="mainbody"><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE="2">$50 per point per contract<BR><BR><I>For example:</I> if the S&amp;P 500 Index value is at 1500 and goes up 5 points to 1505 the difference is 5 points which equals $250.<BR><BR>$50 x 5 = $250 profit or loss per contract.</FONT></SPAN></DD><DT>&nbsp; ==================================</DT><DT>The value of the S&amp;P 500 futures contract can be calculated by multiplying the futures price by $500. For example,<BR>&nbsp;if the S&amp;P&#39;s are trading at 1089.50, the value would then be $500 X 1089.50, or $544,750.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>&nbsp;The minimum price fluctuation (tick) for the S&amp;P&#39;s are .10, so a tick up or down is worth $25 per contract. A full<BR>&nbsp;point has 10 ticks in it, which is worth $250 per contract (.10 X $25 = $250).<BR>&nbsp;<BR>&nbsp;The E-Mini S&amp;P 500 is on the same price scale as the regular (full) S&amp;P 500, the difference lies in the tick and<BR>&nbsp;point values. The E-Mini S&amp;P trades in .25 ticks and is worth $12.50 per tick; and a point is worth $50<BR>($12.50 X 4 = $50).<BR><BR>As you can see the E-Mini&#39;s are one fifth the size of the full S&amp;P 500 contract.</DT></DL>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:41:51 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:225400</guid></item><item><title>Re: 考考大家, 华儿街经典考题, 答对的有奖励:)))))))) - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/226516</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: Re: 考考大家, 华儿街经典考题, 答对的有奖励:))))))))<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Nov 9 03:59:27 2006)<BR><BR>刚看到，是真正的物质奖励，我离三藩太远了，能用包子代替么？<BR><BR>第一个问题，我就不算了。<BR>第三个问题，三个人一起猜硬币，如果都猜对或者都猜错，就重新来，有人猜对，有人<BR>猜错，那就猜错被淘汰，直到剩一个人。fair game，肯定每人机会相同。<BR><BR>第二个问题，要具体讨论一下。<BR><BR>简单言之，就是，如果狱卒有权利选择给不给犯人提示信息，那就是个博弈论问题，取<BR>决于狱卒的动机和犯人对狱卒动机的猜测。<BR><BR>如果狱卒必须打开一个门，给犯人提示信息。<BR>那取决于，狱卒是不是事先知道哪个门是美女。如果不知道，只是随机打开一个门，碰<BR>巧是老虎，那么换不换一样，各1/2。但如果狱卒事先具有充分信息，直到结果，那么<BR>他因为不能打开有美女的门，那么他打开门的选择具有了倾向性。所以这个后另一个门<BR>的概率上升到2/3，换更有利。<BR><BR>总之换，反正不会吃亏。<BR><BR><BR>具体的数学计算，这是我以前写的，问题不一样，但意思相同，如果有兴趣，可以看看。<BR><BR>囚徒问题<BR><BR>有三个囚徒，A，B，C等待判决，国王宣布，他们中的一个人将会被赦免，另两个将会<BR>被处决。在执行的前夜，A很希望能够知道自己的命运，于是询问监狱长W，监狱长W虽<BR>然知道结果，但按照规定不能提前告诉犯人。W想了一下，就告诉了A，B将一定会被处<BR>决。A听了很高兴，因为他认为B一定被处决，所以自己获释的概率就由1/3上升到了1/2<BR>。但W认为结果并没有改变，A被处决的概率还是1/3，请问W和A谁想的有道理？<BR><BR>这个题目是一个可以用来比较好的理解条件概率概念的问题。首先简单介绍一下条件概<BR>率的一些符号规定和几个基本结论。现有A，B两个事件，<BR><BR>P(A)是A事件发生的概率<BR>P(B)是B事件发生的概率<BR>P(A，B)是A，B事件同时发生的概率<BR>P(A | B)是已知B发生的情况下，A发生的概率<BR>P(B | A)是已知A发生的情况下，B发生的概率<BR>P(A,B)=P(A | B)*P(B)=P(B | A)*P(A)<BR>P(A | B)=P(A,B)/P(B)<BR>P(B | A)=P(A,B)/P(A)<BR><BR>我们现在用以上的定义和公式来解决这个问题<BR>P(W say B executed)<BR>=P(W say B | A pardoned)*P(A pardoned)+P(W say B | B pardoned)*P(B pardoned)<BR>+P(W say B | C pardoned)*P(C pardoned)<BR>=1/2*1/3+0*1/3+1*1/3=1/2<BR><BR>P(A pardoned | W say B executed)<BR>=P(A pardoned,W say B)/P(W say B)<BR>=P(W say B | A pardoned)*P(A pardoned)/P(W say B)<BR>=(1/2*1/3) / (1/2)=1/3<BR><BR>所以当已知W说B肯定被处决的情况下，A被赦免的概率依然是1/3，而与此同时C被赦免<BR>的概率却上升到了2/3，结果依然归一，我们来证明这一点。<BR><BR>P(C pardoned | W say B executed)<BR>=P(C pardoned, W say B)/P(W say B)<BR>=P(W say B | C pardoned)*P(C pardoned)/P(W say B)<BR>=(1*1/3) / (1/2)<BR>=2/3<BR><BR>值得注意的是，在这个题目里面P(W say B)指的是W说B被处决的概率，并不真的是B被<BR>处决的概率。<BR>另外一点值得注意的是，W say B是指W say B was executed to A，是对A说的，之所<BR>以排除掉B之后，A和C的概率并不是50%对50%的原因是，W对A说的话是有选择的，W只能<BR>在B和C中选出一个。而P(W say B | A pardoned)=1/2，P(W say B | C pardoned)=1，<BR>两者并不相等，也就是说A和C的对称性在这里已经被破坏掉了。<BR><BR>所以我们说A被赦免的概率并没有上升，但A也并不是没有获得新的信息，他获得的新信<BR>息就是C被赦免的概率上升到了2/3。这个时候，如果我们说三个人是抽签，一个人会被<BR>赦免，此时A如果有一个权力可以和C换签，那么我们认为，A决定换是更加有利的。<BR><BR>这样我们就归结到了以前讨论过的那个卡片问题，三个卡片中有一个卡片上画了汽车，<BR>两张空白，如果抽到画有汽车的卡片，就可以获得一辆汽车，游戏者上去抽取了第一张<BR>，还没有翻开，此时主持人走上来翻开了第三张，第三张上是空白卡片。主持人问游戏<BR>者想不想换第二张卡片。此时，游戏者应该问主持人两个问题，第一，主持人是不是事<BR>先已经知道了三张中哪一张是汽车，第二，这个游戏的规则是不是早就设计好了，当游<BR>戏者选取了一张之后，主持人就上来翻开一张不是汽车的卡片。如果两个问题的回答都<BR>是肯定的话，主持人事先知道全部信息，并且主持人一定会上来翻开一张卡片，那么，<BR>我们说此时，第二张卡片是汽车的的概率上升到了2/3，因为我们从主持人那里获得了<BR>新的信息，第一张卡片和第二张卡片的对称性已经被破坏了，我们应该换到第二张卡片。<BR><BR>另外，因为此时游戏规则已经完全确定了，主持人的主观意志已经没有任何影响，所以<BR>这个游戏就变成了一个纯粹的概率问题，而非博弈论问题了。但如果游戏规则并不要求<BR>主持人中途翻开一张卡片，而是取决于主持人自己，那么，游戏就是一个博弈论问题了<BR>。因为我们并不知道主持人是不是希望你获得奖品，并且，我们要对主持人的智力水平<BR>进行猜测，有可能主持人会利用以上的概率设置陷阱来引诱你掉入陷阱，当然我们也可<BR>以反其道来利用这一点，但一切都取决于我们能不能对主持人的意图和主持人的智力水<BR>平有一个正确的评估了，当然与此同时主持人也在对游戏者的智力水平进行着评估，两<BR>者形成了博弈。]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:40:42 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:226516</guid></item><item><title>IB option commission fee的节省技巧一则 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/226657</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: IB option commission fee的节省技巧一则<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 7 15:30:40 2008)<BR><BR>Exchange<BR>CBOE All USD 0.00 USD 0.00<BR>NASDAQOM All USD 0.45 USD -0.30<BR><BR>用CBOE买卖都是0.70 per contract，用NASDAQOM买有0.30的rebate，卖要多charge 0.<BR>45。<BR>所以IB买option的时候用NASDAQOM，卖的时候用CBOE，这样可以节省option<BR>commission fee。]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:44:46 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:226657</guid></item><item><title>网站有options 的历史数据?</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/226659</link><description><![CDATA[这个都不知道，还玩option，哼哼<BR><BR>TDAmeritrade的一个很好的工具叫做Options 360 has everything you want。。<BR><BR>包子拿来。。。<BR><BR><BR>【 在 godeyejie (抢钱的狐狸) 的大作中提到: 】<BR>: 什么网站有options 的历史数据? 要钱的也行.<BR>: 比如我想看qqqq 47 Jul Put 的数据，从开始有到expired每天的数据。<BR>: 有没有options 和 underlying stock correlation 的图线的软件？<BR>: 请各位大虾指点]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:00:12 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:226659</guid></item><item><title>All TradeStation 8.1 versions - MACD股市技术分析俱乐部 专业的股票,指标,外汇,期货,证券,金融,图文软件,下载交流中心!</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/227059</link><description><![CDATA[http://i2.tinypic.com/82jqa0g.gif<BR><BR>Download TradeStation 8.1 versions here:<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82329994/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3002.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82331838/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3006.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82333664/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3053.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82335264/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3059.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82336930/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3065.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82338466/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3066.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82340001/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3132.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82341544/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3146.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82343109/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3159.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82344643/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3223.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82346053/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3228.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82347459/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3229.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82348892/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3246.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82350207/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3247.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82351297/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3258.EXE<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82352469/Setup_TradeStation_8.1_Build_3261.EXE<BR><BR>Tradestation 8.1 crack:<BR>http://rapidshare.com/files/82508623/Tradestation_8.1_crack.rar<BR><BR>http://i18.tinypic.com/71wduo7.gif<BR>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:53:39 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:227059</guid></item><item><title>O&amp;#039;Neil shares tips on getting through market correction - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/227143</link><description><![CDATA[<TABLE ALIGN="center" BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD CLASS="wenzhang" WIDTH="80%"><A CLASS="news" HREF="/pc/index.php?id=huster"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD CLASS="jiahui-4" ALIGN="left"><TABLE BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD HEIGHT="20" WIDTH="92%"><BR></TD><TD WIDTH="8%">[ 1 ]</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE STYLE="table-layout: fixed;" BORDER="" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING="" WIDTH="577"><TBODY><TR><TD CLASS="jiawenzhang-type"><P>发信人: huster (古德里安), 信区: Stock<BR>标 题: O&#39;Neil shares tips on getting through market correction<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 10 14:40:31 2008)<BR><BR>(ZT)<BR>BY KATE STALTER<BR>INVESTOR&#39;S BUSINESS DAILY<BR><BR>There&#39;s no getting around it: Sitting through a market correction is no fun.<BR>You might see a stock breaking out of a base, and think to yourself, &quot;I<BR>should have gotten in on that one.&quot;<BR><BR>But IBD Chairman and Founder Bill O&#39;Neil has long reminded folks: Avoid<BR>making new buys during a market correction.<BR><BR>In fact, he takes it a step further. &quot;If investors have done it right, they&#39;<BR>ve pretty much sold everything and raised cash,&quot; he told IBDextra.<BR><BR>But if you&#39;re the impatient type, that&#39;s not always easy advice to follow.<BR>However, there are some things to remind yourself about when you get antsy<BR>or discouraged in the downturn.<BR><BR>First, a number of leading stocks have broken out of base patterns in recent<BR>weeks, but the breakouts have fizzled. For example, chemical and fertilizer<BR>maker CF Industries Holdings (CF), which has been among the leading stocks<BR>for months, cleared a cup-shaped base in June. The market had already been<BR>in a correction for several weeks.<BR><BR>CF rallied for only two days after its breakout, then reversed. As of early<BR>July, it was trading 11% below its buy point, and beneath its 50-day moving<BR>average.<BR><BR>That&#39;s just one recent example that illustrates why it&#39;s so risky to attempt<BR>buying stocks in a downturn.<BR><BR>So what&#39;s the best course to follow? O&#39;Neil advises watching stocks that are<BR>defensive in nature right now. For instance, discount retailer Costco<BR>Wholesale (COST), featured in the July 8 Daily Stock Analysis video, sports<BR>a stable record of earnings growth in recent years. Lately, it&#39;s been<BR>forming a bullish chart pattern, and receiving good support from<BR>institutional investors.<BR><BR>It makes sense that a company like Costco would be a defensive play. As<BR>consumers worry about a weak economy, they&#39;re tightening their belts.<BR>Discounters and bulk warehouses are among beneficiaries. Wal-Mart (WMT) is<BR>another big-cap discount retailer showing good chart action right now, while<BR>other stocks are tumbling.<BR><BR>O&#39;Neil points out that medicals, too, are acting well. Celgene (CELG),</P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:10:21 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:227143</guid></item><item><title>CYB: 25.62 +0.05 (+0.20%) : WISDOMTREE DREYFUS - Yahoo! Finance</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/227306</link><description><![CDATA[The investment seeks to earn current income reflective of money market rates in China available to foreign investors and to provide exposure to changes in the value of the Chinese Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar. The fund normally invests in a combination of U.S. money market securities with forward currency contracts and currency swaps which is designed to create a position economically similar to a money market security denominated in Chinese]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:27:38 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:227306</guid></item><item><title>发现IB真的很不错 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/230140</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: 发现IB真的很不错<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 28 00:26:47 2008)<BR><BR>可以把一家人的所有普通/IRA帐号都放在一个master account下管理，一个TWS<BR>session可以做所有交易。<BR><BR>IRA有option/margin。<BR><BR>http://individuals.interactivebrokers.com/en/accounts/individuals/individualMain.php?ib_entity=llc#]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:48:30 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:230140</guid></item><item><title>Price Vs Volume - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/230142</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: Price Vs Volume<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jul 27 10:58:40 2008)<BR><BR>价涨量增， 顺势推动；<BR>价跌量增，有待观察；<BR>价平量增，做头做底；<BR>价涨量缩， 呈现背离；<BR>价跌量缩， 情况互异；<BR>价平量缩， 反弹止涨；<BR>价涨量平，反弹止涨；<BR>价跌量平， 趋势不变；<BR>价平量平， 多空观望.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:54:52 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:230142</guid></item><item><title>黄金30年的牛熊历程（资料）</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/236405</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN CLASS="postbody2">黄金30年的牛熊历程（资料）<BR>　　 1967年11月18日，英镑在战后第二次贬值；1968年3月17日，“黄金总汇”解体；1969年8月8日，法郎贬值11.11％。<BR>　　 1971年8月15日，美国总统尼克松发表电视讲话，关闭黄金窗口，停止各国政府或中央银行持有美元前来兑换黄金。美元挣脱黄金的牢狱，自由浮动于外汇市场。<BR>　　 1972年这一年，伦敦市场的金价从1盎司46美元涨到64美元。<BR>　　 1973年，金价冲破100美元。<BR>　　 1974年到1977年，金价在130美元到180美元之间波动。<BR>　　 1978年，原油飙涨达一桶30美元，金价涨到244美元。<BR>　　 1979年，金价涨到500美元。10月，美国通胀率冲破12％。<BR>　　 1980年元月的头两个交易日，金价达到634美元，美国财长米勒宣布财政部不再出售黄金，之后不到30分钟金价大涨30美元达715美元，元月21日创 850美元新高。美国总统卡特不得不出来打压金市，表示一定会不惜任何代价来维护美国在世界上的地位，当天收盘时金价下跌了50美元。<BR>　　 1980年2月22日，金价重挫145美元。<BR>　　<BR>　　 当代首次黄金大牛市宣告结束，时间长达12年。金价从1968年的35美元涨到1980年的850美元的12年间，每年有30％的获利率。1980年黄金 投资额达1兆六千亿美元，已超出只有1兆四千亿美元的美国股票市值。而在1959年，黄金的投资额仅是美国股票市值的五分之一。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1981年，金价每盎司的盘势峰顶是599美元。到了1985年，盘势降到 300美元左右。1987年，美国股市崩盘后，黄金价格触及486美元的峰顶后便一路下滑。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1988 年至1999年的有关黄金市场的评论：<BR>　　 1988年2月8日：上周五每盎司金价以439美元收市，令黄金好友捏一把冷汗，因为金价支持点正好在此水平，技术分析告诉我们，此水平一旦跌破，金价就如入无支持之境，要跌至什么价位才能企稳，技术派已不敢肯定，艾略特理论的指示是180美元。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1988年8月20日：既然投资者忧虑经济衰退迟早来临，那么黄金是不应忽略的投资工具。在30年代股市大崩溃时，最有代表性的金矿股 Homestake的股价从1929年的7美元上升至1932年的46美元(期间道指跌幅达90%)。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1989年2月1日：金价从1980年1月20日的历史高位850美元计，到 1988年年底，美元金价已跌去52%。在这十年内，美国的通胀率升幅共达 90%，以低通胀率见称的日本也在20%的水平，而黄金的这段走势说明它没有抗拒通胀的能力，黄金应从“保值商品”上除名(有意思的是，若以日元计，这十 年的金价跌幅最历害，达75%。)。<BR>　　 在80年代，黄金无息成本的弱势凸现。因为在70年代，债券及银行利息都低于通胀率，也就是“负利率”，这时黄金无息可以忽略不计，到了80年代，债券和其他固定利息的投资工具所提供的收益高于通胀率，令黄金的魅力骤然失色。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1989年2月13日：名画和古董与金银一样是无息产品，为什么前者在80年代的价格大涨？原因是物以稀为贵。名画和古董往往是独一无二的，而金银能不断生产。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1989年11月15日：金价从9月中旬的350美元回升至11月14日的391.5美元收市，两个月升幅达11%，令“金甲虫”兴奋不已，但往上已难有作为。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1989年12月9日：金价在11月27日见427美元之后，市上传出苏联大量抛售黄金的消息，令市场价格大幅波动。事实上，在过去十多年中，作为世界第二大黄金出产国的“苏联卖金”传闻，对下降的金价发挥了巨大作用。<BR>　　 金价确实与通胀率无关。1981年，美国通胀率上升8.9%，当年金价却大跌32%；1986年通胀率跌至1.1%，但当年金价上升19%。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1990年5月24日：市场出现18.7吨(每吨为二万七千盎司)黄金的沽盘，是美国清盘官将最近申请破产的储贷银行及财务公司所持黄金集中推出套现，金价大跌，推低至360美元。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1990年7月12日：1989年新产黄金加上旧金翻碎金整合(铸成金条)等来源，黄金总供应量为二千七百二十三吨。在需求方面，首饰用去一百三十八吨、电子业用了一百三十八吨，金币消耗量一百二十三吨，其他(主要为实金持有者)购进了六百五十一吨。<BR>　　 首饰金的需求占了黄金总供应量的67%，而且1989年的首饰用黄金较 1988年的约一千五百吨增长了23%。尽管如此，金价仍是不振。1988年，各国央行买卖黄金出现净购额285吨，1989年则为净卖额二百五十五吨。<BR>　　 由于冷战式微，黄金作为政治保险效用也消失了，无利息还得付仓租的黄金恐非精明的投资人所选。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1990年9月5日：伊拉克入侵科威特，金价从370美元反弹至417美元，又往下打回383美元。由于美国财赤日趋严重，美元汇价摇摇欲坠和全球信贷危 机呼之欲出，金价长期看有向500美元的“颈线”靠拢的趋势，一旦升至 500美元，最低升幅可令金价见700 美元，中间数为850美元，最高可见1000美元。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1991年1月12日：现在是“现金为王”，这与70年代末80年代初的“现金是垃圾”，简直天壤之别，黄金已成为“一沉百踩”的商品。但金价仍有可能凌厉反弹。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1991年6月13日：金银一齐上升，却有不同的理由。盎司白银价在3 月曾跌至4美元以下，不及其最高价的十分之一，原因是大家以为白银供过于求。但5月中旬，美国一家机构认为白银恰恰是求过于供，1991年白银产量为四亿 八千一百万盎司，需求则达五亿九千万盎司。于是白银大幅上扬，最高见4.64美元。走势派指出，白银好淡的分水岭在4.22美元，已进入上升轨道。<BR>　　 至于黄金，则是穷极思变。大部份机构投资者组合已没有黄金，美国大规模互惠基金Kemper上月解散属下的黄金基金。买卖黄金矿股票的华盛顿Spokane证券交易所宣布暂时停业，等等。人们终于开始反向操作，令金价反弹。<BR>　　还有一个“恐惧指数”也有意思。美国的一位投资顾问根据美联储存金时价与美元(M3)供应量的关系，制成一项恐惧指数。五月底盎司金价 360.75 美元，美联储存金二亿六千一百九十万盎司，M3发行量为四十亿七千六百万，等于每百美元含金值226美元，这便是恐惧指数2.26，它已接近尼克松在 1971年宣布取消金本位创下的恐惧指数2点的纪录。美元含金量2.26%，意味着其余97.7%美元都是无中生有靠美国政府信用支持，而美国政府负债累 累，这97.74美元全是借贷而来。于是，人们抛美元买黄金。恐惧指数的最高点是10点，正在1980年黄金历史天价时。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1994年10月8日：英国著名的裁缝街的西装，数百年来的价格都是五、六盎司黄金的水准，是黄金购买力历久不变的明证。盎司金价若突破396美元，下一个目标是406美元，此关一破，黄金牛市便告诞生，可看1200美元。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1996年2月5日：上周五盎司金价一度升达418.5美元，打破了1993年高价409美元，技术专家认为，此关一破，金价有机会破445美元。<BR>　　各国央行不但卖金，而且租金。卖金方面，最高的是1992年卖了六百吨，1995估计为三千吨。金商看淡未来金价，因此设法向储存大量黄金的 中央银行租金，租期三年至五年不等，然后在市场沽出。对金矿主而言，这不过是把三五年后的产金以当前价格卖出，等于把未来利润先行兑现，而央行则“盘活” 了资产。据英伦银行12月上旬公布的数据，仅伦敦金商就向央行租借一千五百吨。<BR>　　 若不算央行和售金，其它早已供不应求。1995年和1994年其金产量差不多，同为二千七百八十七吨，而消耗量在四万吨水平，黄金赤字在一千一百吨至一千二百吨之间。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1997年7月8日：西方各中央银行有秩序地消减黄金储备。资料显示，荷兰央行直接沽金，比利时铸造金币变相售金，瑞士央行计划分期出售约值五十亿美元黄 金，建立“大屠杀黄金”，以示该国二次大战期间大做纳粹生意的悔意。上周四，澳洲公布今年上半年陆续卖出约值十七亿美元的黄金，虽然售金量不大，却占该国 黄金储备的三分之二，说明不再把黄金视为主要货币和储备。澳洲居南非、美国之后，是世界第三大产金国。<BR>　　 结果，盎司黄金美元价在370至400美元之间徘徊约两年之久，上周四突然在纽约市场急挫，周五伦敦跌至324.75美元，为1985年以来的最低水平。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1998年3月24日：每盎司金价在1月9日跌至278.7美元的最低价，昨在294美元水平徘徊。黄金盛极而衰，现在其市价已低于平均生产成本每盎司 315美元，世界有一半金矿亏本，相继停工势所难免，这令过去二年出现新出土黄金供不应求，所提炼的黄金供应比需求少约一千吨，只是由于央行抛金及民间藏 金在金价前景看淡之下纷纷沽出，以致金价下挫之势未能扭转。<BR>　　加拿大巴烈克金矿计划大规模铸造“创世纪金币”，计划用一千吨至二千五百吨黄金造此币。如果计划落实，将是耗金量最大的金币铸造，因为以往 南非克鲁格兰金币一共耗金一千四百吨，1986年日本裕仁金币用金量一百八十二吨，1991年明仁金币用金六十吨。对黄金市场而言，这是一大利好。去年各 国央行售金量是八百二十五吨，“创世纪金币”将可完全消化。<BR>　　<BR>　　 1999年7月6日：英伦银行周二以每盎司261.2美元售出二十五吨黄金，筹集得二亿九百八十万美元，这是英伦银行近二十年的首次拍卖，也是该行五次拍 卖的第一次。自英国公布计划在未来三至五年出售其七百十五吨黄金储备的四百十五吨以来，金价已跌逾一成。消息宣布后金价随即跌破 260美元水平，达256.4美元，创下20年新低。<BR>　　 黄金不会人间蒸发、磨损的“永恒价值”，为市场留下祸根。因为数千年来存世的黄金估计达十二万五千吨，其中约三分之一在各国央行的金库里，其余为私人藏金和首饰物。<BR>　　 一边是央行大肆抛售(瑞士央行也计划估售一千三百吨左右黄金)，另一方面金矿主开采数量有增无减。原因有二：第一是黄金单位生产成本下降， 1998年跌20%，每盎司平均美元生产成本只有206美元；第二是矿务公司已发展出“产铜为主产金为副”的生产模式，估计副产的黄金1995年占黄金总 产量的9%，2005年将增至17%。黄金随黄铜而来，意味矿场愈来愈不会把黄金产量与价格挂构。<BR>　　 有人已预估下世纪初金价见150美元，目前金价真的不知伊于胡底了。作为贷币商品甚至纯粹商品，黄金已失去“长期持有”的价值，这是投资者不得不承认和留意的。<BR>　　<BR>　　 市场的供求与市场价格相互作用。<BR>　　从实际需求看，黄金是供不应求的，每年大约有一千吨的缺口。但各国央行的储备买卖却是追涨杀跌，让黄金市场变得求不应供。“黄金跌得愈低，官 金出售的可能性愈大”的规律。随着黄金价格的上扬，从1982年的375美元涨到1987年股市崩盘后的500美元左右，就少有中央银行出售黄金。之后， 黄金再次转势，到1992年时降到350美元左右，这段期间各央行总共兑清了五百吨黄金。从1992年到1999年，黄金跌到300美元以下，各国央行总 共出售了三千吨左右黄金，一年约四百吨。各国央行最后发现敌人就是它们自己。只要中央银行持有的官金过剩，每次官金出售就会成为头条新闻，金价就会下跌， 出售所得相应减少。<BR>　　 下跌的金价可能刺激了它的实际需求。1990年，用于首饰和电子工业的黄金比1980年高出50％以上，比1994年高出三分之一左右。单单用于首饰生产的黄金就比1850年高出一百倍，由于人口在此期间只成长了五倍，因此，平均每人的金饰消费增加了二十倍。<BR>　　 1999年8月26日，每盎司金价跌至251.9美元，创下二十年来低位，在底部横盘两年后，于2001年再次发力上攻，到2003年年底为414美元，涨幅达60％。</SPAN>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:43:25 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:236405</guid></item><item><title>Investlist Faq-O-Matic</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/252230</link><description><![CDATA[<B><FONT SIZE="+2">cisco investlist</FONT></B><BR><FONT SIZE="+2">Frequently Asked Questions</FONT>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:06:17 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:252230</guid></item><item><title>Jeremy Grantham: Don&amp;#039;t Buy Too Soon at SmartMoney.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/269663</link><description><![CDATA[<P>And, therefore, how could one&#39;s confidence that the senior people would get us through the storm be very high? Prior to three months ago, we were investing in emerging-market equities. Then we battened down the hatches, and I changed my view from avoid all risk except emerging markets to avoid all risk, period.</P><P>The terrible thing — after all this pain — is that the U.S. equity market is not even cheap. You would imagine that, given the amount of panic, that it would be. But it started from such a high level in 2000 that it still has not yet worked its way down to trend, although it is getting close. But the really bad news is that great bubbles in history always overcorrected. So although the fair value of the S&amp;P today may be about 1025, typically bubbles overcorrect by quite a bit, possibly by 20%. That is very discouraging.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:13:26 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:269663</guid></item><item><title>World Deflation Comparison - Stock Cycle Analysis using Gann, Elliott Wave, Square of 9/Nine, Angles and Geometry</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/269669</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:52:23 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:269669</guid></item><item><title>Inflation-Deflation - Stock Cycle Analysis using Gann, Elliott Wave, Square of 9/Nine, Angles and Geometry</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/269670</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:52:40 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:269670</guid></item><item><title>While Financials Drag Markets Down, Five Ways to Stay in Play -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/270977</link><description><![CDATA[<P>And outside of the U.S., I think some of the opportunities are even more attractive. I&#39;m looking closely at some of the top Asian regional funds:</P><OL><LI><STRONG>China:</STRONG> I&#39;m looking at the iShares FTSE/Xinhua 25 (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of FXI" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</A>) as one option, or perhaps even better, at some of the broader China ETFs like the SPDRs S&amp;P China (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of GXC" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gxc">GXC</A>) or competing funds from PowerShares, which may be the preferred China access despite the popularity (and my ownership of) FXI.</LI><LI><STRONG>Emerging Asia:</STRONG> State Street Global Advisors also offers the S&amp;P Emerging Asia Pacific (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of GMF" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmf">GMF</A>), which I find very appealing.</LI><LI><STRONG>Fundamentals:</STRONG> From PowerShares, for you fundamentalists (and contrarians with recent RAFI performance), there&#39;s the FTSE RAFI Asia Pacific ex-Japan (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of PAF" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/paf">PAF</A>) or FTSE RAFI Asia Pacific ex-Japan (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of PDQ" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pdq">PDQ</A>) offerings.</LI><LI><STRONG>Regional:</STRONG> iShares also has some nice regional offerings now like the iShares Pacific ex-Japan ETF (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of EPP" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/epp">EPP</A>) or the iShares Asia 50 ETF (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of AIA" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aia">AIA</A>).</LI><LI><STRONG>Currency:</STRONG> And if you want to really make a bet, how about the Chinese yuan in the form of <A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of CYB" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cyb">CYB</A> - the WisdomTree Yuan currency fund. Doesn&#39;t move much now because of how it&#39;s pegged, but look out when the controls come off. Murray&#39;s doing a profile on that one in the next ETFR, I believe.</LI></OL><P>Right now, when your heart is weak and your strength is waning, this is when fortunes are made, right? Right? Anyone?</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:45:27 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:270977</guid></item><item><title>Shorting The Bond Bubble? Hold On -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/270978</link><description><![CDATA[So watching from the sidelines may be the strategy for now. Ways to short the bond bubble include going long on the ProShares Ultra-Short 20+ Treasury (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TBT" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tbt">TBT</A>) and ProShares Ultra-Short 7-10 Year Treasury Fund (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of PST" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pst">PST</A>) ETFs (but understand the constant leverage trap first) and short selling the iShares Lehman 20+ Year Treasure Bond ETF (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TLT" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlt">TLT</A>).]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:18:22 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:270978</guid></item><item><title>Simple Plans to Beat the Market - Kiplinger.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/271699</link><description><![CDATA[<P><B>Larkin&#39;s Portfolio</B></P><P><B>25% iShares Barclays Aggregate Bond ETF</B> (symbol <B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=AGG&page=stockTipsheet">AGG</A></B>) Tracks a broad index of high-quality U.S. bonds<BR><B>25% iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=LQD&page=stockTipsheet">LQD</A></B>) Tracks an index of the most liquid, long-term corporate bonds<BR><B>10% Fidelity Floating Rate High Income</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=FFRHX&page=stockTipsheet">FFRHX</A></B>) Invests in bank loans that adjust to rising interest rates<BR><B>10% iShares Barclays MBS Bond</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=MBB&page=stockTipsheet">MBB</A></B>) Tracks a broad index of mortgage-backed securities<BR><B>7.5% SPDR DB International Govt Inflation-Protected Bond</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=WIP&page=stockTipsheet">WIP</A></B>) Invests in an index of non-U.S., inflation-linked bonds<BR><B>7.5% PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=PCY&page=stockTipsheet">PCY</A></B>)Tracks an index of emerging-markets government debt<BR><B>7.5% iShares Barclays TIPS Bond</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=TIP&page=stockTipsheet">TIP</A></B>) Tracks an index of inflation-protected, U.S. Treasury securities<BR><B>7.5% iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=HYG&page=stockTipsheet">HYG</A></B>) Tracks an index of high-yield bonds</P><P><B>Our Picks</B> Stick with one family</P><P>In the Kiplinger&#39;s portfolio, we use only Vanguard index funds because their costs are low and it&#39;s easier for investors to buy funds from a single family. Small-company stocks tend to outpace big-company stocks over time, so we overweight them a bit—but not so much as to add more volatility. Similarly, we include a couple of bond funds to reduce the portfolio&#39;s ups and downs. But we don&#39;t overdo the bonds because we want the bulk of the package to benefit from the long-term growth potential of stocks. And although property markets look dicey and real estate investment trusts have been battered, we add some REITs because they have delivered good long-term returns and can help tone down the portfolio&#39;s overall volatility.</P><P><B>Kiplinger&#39;s Portfolio</B></P><P><B>25% Vanguard 500 Index</B> (symbol <B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=VFINX&page=stockTipsheet">VFINX</A></B>) Tracks Standard &amp; Poor&#39;s 500-stock index<BR><B>15% Vanguard Small-Cap</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=NAESX&page=stockTipsheet">NAESX</A></B>) Tracks an index of small-company U.S. stocks<BR><B>20% Vanguard Total International Stock</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=VGSTX&page=stockTipsheet">VGTSX</A></B>) Tracks an index of stocks from developed and emerging nations<BR><B>5% Vanguard REIT</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=VGSIX&page=stockTipsheet">VGSIX</A></B>) Tracks an index of U.S. real estate investment trusts<BR><B>25% Vanguard Total Bond Market Index</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=VBMFX&page=stockTipsheet">VBMFX</A></B>) Tracks a broad index of high-quality U.S. bonds<BR><B>10% Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities</B> (<B><A HREF="http://tfn.kiplinger.com/index.php?ticker=VIPSX&page=stockTipsheet">VIPSX</A></B>) Invests most assets in Treasury inflation-indexed bonds</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:52:31 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:271699</guid></item><item><title>Direxion Launches 3X Leveraged ETFs -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/272741</link><description><![CDATA[<P>ecently, the daily returns of these funds should both excite, and scare onlookers.</P><P>Here is a rundown of the 3X funds that Direxion now offers:</P><UL><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of BGU" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bgu">BGU</A>) – Large Cap Bull 3X Shares – Russell 1000</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of BGZ" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bgz">BGZ</A>) – Large Cap Bear 3X Shares – Russell 1000</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TNA" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tna">TNA</A>) – Small Cap Bull 3X Shares – Russell 2000</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TZA" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tza">TZA</A>) – Small Cap Bear 3X Shares – Russell 2000</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of ERX" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erx">ERX</A>) – Energy Bull 3X Shares – Russell 1000 Energy</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of ERY" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ery">ERY</A>) – Energy Bear 3X Shares – Russell 1000 Energy</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of FAS" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fas">FAS</A>) – Financial Bull 3X Shares – Russell 1000 Financial Services</LI><LI>(<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of FAZ" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/faz">FAZ</A>) – Financial Bear 3X Shares – Russell 1000 Financial Services</LI></UL><P>Although trading in these new ETFs is currently light, expect more liquidity in the coming months as more investors and traders become aware of these new funds, much like the launch of the very popular ProShares 2X ETFs. Many of the popular ProShares funds like <A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of UYG" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uyg">UYG</A> and <A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of SKF" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/skf">SKF</A> were slow at first, but now they turn out a tremendous amount of volume on a daily basis. As for the expense ratios for these new triple return ETFs, they are listed from 94 to 102 basis points, which is fair for 3X leverage. As these funds gain in popularity, I would expect more fund launches in additional sectors.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:56:26 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:272741</guid></item><item><title>Credit Card Cancer -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/272906</link><description><![CDATA[This week, with his pronouncement that &quot;credit is the lifeblood of a healthy economy,&quot; President Obama reiterated what has been one of his most common themes in diagnosing our economic problem. The president has relied on this bedrock belief to propose policies that place the restoration of credit as the highest priority. However, despite his seemingly earnest intentions, the president and his economic advisors have misdiagnosed the ailment. Savings, not credit, is the lifeblood of a healthy economy. When not used properly credit can be like a cancer that sickens an otherwise healthy economy.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:14:06 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:272906</guid></item><item><title>Peter Schiff: Outlook for the Gold Market -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/272909</link><description><![CDATA[<P><B>TWST:</B> Why does everybody key in on the US dollar side of the equation?</P><P><B>Mr. Schiff:</B> Because gold was priced in dollars, it&#39;s traded in dollars and so we all look at it as the dollar price, and the fact that gold has not made a new high in dollars during this economic crisis has led some to believe that maybe it&#39;s lost its luster, it&#39;s not a safe haven. But this rise of the dollar is very suspicious to me, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s justified. But it&#39;s been the unlikely beneficiary of all the problems. You&#39;ve got the problem centered in the US economy; the epicenter of the financial crisis is in America. The reason that the world is in trouble is mainly because of bad loans made to Americans and it&#39;s our economy that I think is a complete facade, a house of cards that has now collapsed, so this dollar rally actually makes no sense.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:28:37 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:272909</guid></item><item><title>dshort.com - Financial Life Cycle Planning</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/273181</link><description><![CDATA[<P>The S&amp;P 500 rally that began last week took a step back today. See <A TARGET="_blank" HREF="/charts/bear-recoveries.html?current-bear">this chart</A> to review the strength of previous rallies during the current bear market.</P><P>We continue to be fascinated with the saga of the <A TARGET="_blank" HREF="/charts/bears/four-bears-large.gif">Four Bad Bears</A>. In nominal terms, the March low in the S&amp;P 500 surpassed the Dow Crash of 1929 over the equivalent time frame. In real (inflation adjusted) terms, the decline is even greater.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:19:55 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:273181</guid></item><item><title>Warning: Leveraged and Inverse ETFs Kill Portfolios--Page 2 - Morningstar - Specialists</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/273376</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:07:33 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:273376</guid></item><item><title>海归论坛 :: 阅读主题 - [转帖]江平在２年前的文章</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/273815</link><description><![CDATA[1.鲁宾为何在1999年7月辞去美国财政部部长职务？<BR>（A）他嫌当财长钱太少，想回华尔街捞钱<BR>（B）克林顿丑闻不断，他不愿再和这样的人混在一起<BR>（C）他想纽约，想与家人多相处<BR>（D）他在华盛顿住不惯<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>鲁宾曾是高盛一流交易员，对经济的洞察力远非格林斯潘、萨默斯或克林顿可比。<BR>在一片歌舞升平中，他已知道，船漏了，随时会沉。他知道其紧迫性，所以必须提前下<BR>船，不能等到克林顿期满。<BR>鲁宾是“强势美元”的始作俑者。受雇于美国政府，他又重新拿出他作为一个一流<BR>交易员的手段，信誓旦旦，劝别人持有美元。<BR>然而他毕竟不是一个超一流交易员，以诈术盈利终难成正果。无数善良的人们因听<BR>信“强势美元”致使血汗所得化为乌有。鲁宾虽荣耀一时，如今又有何颜面去见天下苍<BR>生？<BR>2.西方国家会像1998年的俄罗斯、2002年的阿根廷一样对其债务赖账不还吗？<BR>（A）一派胡言，西方国家国债评级全是“AAA”<BR>（B）不可能，即使有一个国家出点问题，其他国家也会帮忙<BR>（C）意大利、西班牙上世纪80年代都曾濒临破产边缘，如今又入不敷出，可能会<BR>出问题<BR>（D）美国欠债太多，可能有问题<BR>（E）除了个别国家外，大部分西方国家都将进行俄罗斯式或阿根廷式债务重整<BR>江平：E<BR>发达国家政府的财务如果全部白纸黑字写出来，比起当年的俄罗斯、阿根廷好不了<BR>多少。现在大家都把头埋在沙子里，不看不想，反正华尔街已经说了是“AAA”，没事<BR>，亏了也不是我一个人。<BR>然而发达国家政府出路何在？大规模通胀，国内百姓不会干。偷着每年涨，然后低<BR>报通胀率，有一定用处，可新债堆积的速度太快了，整体情况还在恶化。金融领域一出<BR>问题，不仅要降息，还要印钞。2002年，他们大规模降息印钞，诈称是为了防止“通货<BR>紧缩”，防止“物价下降”。这次借口还没找好。<BR>体面一点的做法是，在将来某一天，他们印够了，给别人塞够了他们的所谓“硬通<BR>货”，然后宣布所有持有国债者，不管是西方公民（现在就交着税）或外国央行（现在<BR>不交税），一视同仁交利息所得税。这等于是变相债务重整。当然，华尔街舆论上会配<BR>合行动，宣称加利息税完全是合理的。<BR>不体面的做法是学俄罗斯和阿根廷：没钱还了，你能拿我怎么样？<BR>3.西方世界“大鱼吃小鱼，小鱼吃虾米”。华尔街是否也是如此？为什么？<BR>（A）确实如此，资金小无法生存<BR>（B）确实如此，人太少力量不足<BR>（C）确实如此，大了就可以操纵市场<BR>（D）确实如此，大公司资本雄厚，抗跌性强<BR>（E）不对，华尔街并非如此<BR>江平：E<BR>华尔街素有“大鱼吃小鱼，小鱼吃虾米”之说，其实未必如此。例如，上世纪90年<BR>代，一个小银行，汉诺佛制造银行（Manufacturers　Hanover），吃下了较大的化学银<BR>行（Chemical　Bank），并沿用化学银行的名字，继而吃下了更为有名的大通银行（<BR>Chase　Manhattan　Bank），并沿用大通的名字，最后吃下了更显赫的摩根银行（JP<BR>Morgan），成为今天的摩根大通（JP　Morgan　Chase）。瑞银（UBS）及美洲银行（<BR>Bank　of　America）　也是以小吃大的产物。花旗银行更是山迪·威尔（Sandy<BR>Weill）从零起步，经十多年兼并收购而打造的庞然大物。<BR>大型投资银行内的部门主管、大牌交易员、投资银行家，更像是自我极度膨胀的封<BR>疆大吏，或是拥兵自重、桀骜不驯的地方军阀，内部自斗不息，外人更无从控制。巴菲<BR>特收购所罗门无功而返，通用（GE）收购基得（Kidder）为假账所坑，美国运通（<BR>America　Express）收购雷曼后吐血数十亿美元。日本、德国甚至英国都曾试图以钱开<BR>道，打进华尔街，结果都被羞辱、戏耍。<BR><BR>4.虽然大部分基金经理业绩平庸，但哈佛、耶鲁、普林斯顿等名校的基金都长期业绩出<BR>众，这些学校基金的基金经理取得长期高回报的主要原因是什么？<BR>（A）他们远离华尔街，不受干扰<BR>（B）他们个人不贪图钱财，敬业、刻苦，因而成效卓著<BR>（C）他们奉行长线投资<BR>（D）他们在传统投资渠道外，又投了对冲基金<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>华尔街绝大部分投资经理都业绩平平。耶鲁、哈佛、普林斯顿大学基金长年回报极<BR>丰，远超指数。不可否认，他们的基金经理对此有一定贡献。但一个更重要的原因，是<BR>因为这几所名校的毕业生，占据了美国社会政界、财界重要位置。校友们对母校大都忠<BR>贞不贰，对母校投资自然也不遗余力地献策。若是能利用手中权力帮助名校，一来为子<BR>女留下后路，二来落个为教育出力的美名，何乐不为？试想国内若有清华基金、北大基<BR>金等，在北京、上海投资房地产，山西、内蒙古投资矿藏，回报率怎会不高？美国某名<BR>校基金数位“高手”长期业绩出众，但离校后搞基金，业绩却不理想，个别很快关门大<BR>吉。<BR>5.长期以来，不少有名的石油地质教授及科学家不断撰文，从科学上论证人类不必<BR>担心能源问题，石油不会紧缺，这是为何？在资产管理行业，投资对冲基金或私募股权<BR>基金不如投共同基金，投资共同基金不如投指数基金，这一事实并不难发现。但某些金<BR>融教授会撰文论证，对冲基金“胜过”共同基金，并用“多元回归”等复杂推理找出了<BR>对冲基金“高额回报”的“关键因素”。这又是为何？<BR>（A）教授关在象牙塔，不知道外面的情况<BR>（B）教授对新能源估计过于乐观<BR>（C）教授拿到的数据有偏差<BR>（D）教授学问深，他们不会弄错的<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>沙特、美孚等在美国设有“慈善”机构，给高校提供教学、科研经费。他们当然希<BR>望人们放心消费石油，成为“瘾君子”，永远离不开他们。教授去那些石油老板控制的<BR>基金会申请经费，提案上若是写上石油不多，劝人们节约用油，能得到批准吗？他们拿<BR>了石油老板的钱，做出的“研究成果”，自然是从“科学”上“证明”，世界上有的是<BR>石油，尽管烧。<BR>少数金融教授出书、出论文“证明”，只有把钱长期交给华尔街才“安全”，才能<BR>“增值”，这也不难理解。<BR>6.1999年年底，原油现货价格是26美元/桶，但原油期货价格却随时间递减，如一<BR>年期货定价是20美元/桶，即市场预测2000年底原油将以20美元/桶成交。二年期货定价<BR>是19美元/桶，五年及五年以上期货定价则都不到18美元/桶。<BR>这种“期现倒挂”现象一直持续，比如2004年年底，原油现货价是44美元/桶，而<BR>七年期货，即2011年年底购买原油价格不到37美元/桶，为什么？<BR>（A）随着时间推移，新能源技术层出不穷，石油总是会跌<BR>（B）产油国互相欺骗，都偷着多出油，多赚钱。尤其是沙特，产油成本只有几美<BR>元一桶，最希望原油跌，以便其垄断市场<BR>（C）华尔街的人都很聪明，这一曲线是由期货与现货的衍生关系定量计算后得到的<BR>（D）石油公司与产油国利用期货市场预售石油，以对冲其将来石油卖不出好价钱<BR>的风险。这一供求关系决定了石油期货总是低于现货<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>石油长期期货在几年前交易极不活跃，很容易操纵。在油价很低时，有极少数具有<BR>战略眼光的人买进了这些长期期货，并买进了能源股。华尔街为了能低位平仓，同时制<BR>造出石油终究会跌这一“客观”气氛，只须花很少的钱，就可以操纵石油期货曲线。A<BR>、B、C、D都是他们给出的借口，用来解释石油期货曲线倒挂，油价长期看跌的“客观<BR>原因”。<BR><BR>7.道琼斯工业平均指数是由30个大公司股票价格加权平均而得。理论上，有没有可<BR>能所有公司都濒临破产，一个指数投资者已损失90%，而道琼斯指数仍维持不变？<BR>（A）绝不可能<BR>（B）不太可能，除非改变指数定义<BR>（C）不太可能，除非只有一两家公司跌<BR>（D）不太可能，除非将指数进行调整，将要破产的公司提前剔出<BR>（E）完全可以做到<BR>江平：E<BR>道指的特殊性是其计算方法以价格加权平均。比如GE股价34美元，市值3400亿美元<BR>，占指数2.3%，而IBM市值只有1600亿美元，但因股价为114美元，权重却有7.8%。如果<BR>GE跌90%，IBM只需上涨30%，道琼斯指数就可维持不变，但投资者已损失近2600亿美元<BR>。然后再让IBM分股，一分为五，GE并股，三十合一。因分股并股时公司市值不变，指<BR>数不变，只改权重，GE、IBM掉个位置，如法炮制，让IBM再跌90%，GE涨30%，投资者再<BR>挨一刀，指数仍然不变。<BR>“9·11”之后股市下跌，但几大指数中，道琼斯指数跌幅最小。我留心比较了一<BR>下，发现道琼30个公司的总市值下降幅度并不小，指数下跌少是因为指数中权重大的小<BR>公司下跌少或者不跌反涨，权重小的大公司则下跌较多。我知道救市资金进来了。<BR>当然，“9·11”是特殊情况，一切有正义感的人都会站在美国一面。我本人多名<BR>好友遇难，自己也有家难回，因而在汽车后座铺了面美国国旗，甚至一度产生同仇敌忾<BR>之心，考虑是否要加入美国国籍。这种情况下用最有效的办法救市，无可非议。<BR>然而，指数是否真的反映市场的长期回报？我自此开始有疑问。至少不是所有的指<BR>数都反映。<BR><BR>8.EEM是华尔街推出的指数化投资新兴市场股票的基金（ETF）。2008年3月14日收盘<BR>这一天，印度的“信任”（Reliance　Industries　Ltd，是一家石化公司）占这一指<BR>数的1.242%，中国的中海油占0.986%，中石油占0.81%，而中石化占0.462%，为什么是<BR>这个顺序？<BR>（A）　“信任”和中海油市值皆高于中石油和中石化<BR>（B）“信任”、中海油比中石油、中石化重要<BR>（C）中石油、中石化虽重要，但利润不如中海油和“信任”高<BR>（D）中石油、中石化虽然重要，虽然市值大，虽然利润高，但潜力远不如中海油<BR>与“信任”<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>这四个公司代号是RIL（信任）、CEO（中海油）、PTR（中石油）及SNP（中石化）<BR>。从重要性、市值、赢利、潜力来看，都是中石油、中石化要好于“信任”或中海油，<BR>而且这也不难分析。我相信，“信任”高管早就不停抛出股票给华尔街经纪人。而中石<BR>油、中石化华尔街则一直空仓，想买买不到。在制定指数时，华尔街会根据手头所拥有<BR>股票尽可能加大权重，而空仓的则尽可能减少权重。“信任”价值最糟，华尔街手头拿<BR>得最多，不仅其分析师“强力买进”的声音叫得最起劲，还要操纵指数，使出浑身解数<BR>倾销。<BR>中石油的情况在2007年9月后有所改变，巴菲特卖出了，其他有价值观念的投资者<BR>也卖出了。数家券商在接盘后“强烈推荐”，与对冲基金联手拉高后出手给了投资者。<BR>9.一个高速成长型现代化金融企业，市盈率（P/E）多少才算合理？<BR>（A）50~100<BR>（B）20~50<BR>（C）10~20<BR>（D）5~10<BR>（E）0~5<BR>江平：E<BR>假如有一个人，自己开了一个公司，再假设这个人唯一的工作就是去赌场赌博，并<BR>且赌博技艺日益高超，短时间内，年赢利从1万成长到1亿美元。你愿意出多少钱收购这<BR>家公司？100亿美元？太多。20亿美元？不行。10亿美元？不行。5亿美元？还是不行。<BR>一旦你做了公司的主人，成了老板，他会与你签订工作合同，你保证他每年收入至<BR>少3000万美元，剩下利润则你与他分成。这下他可以心情轻松地去赌，输了赢了都不怕<BR>。他有3000万美元保底，赢了多得，输了你掏。所以市盈率（P/E）是5倍仍然太高。<BR>P/E是零如何？即他白送你一个公司，你一分钱不出做老板，能不能要？万万不可<BR>。你仍得付他工资奖金，而你成为老板后突然发现他自吹的赢利都是假账，并且他违过<BR>法，坐过牢，如今一身法律责任，都由你老板承担。<BR>现代化的金融公司，只能建不能买，即使是好公司，买到你手中也会变坏。传统化<BR>的金融公司可以买，10倍、20倍P/E都可，只要其赢利是可持续的，是收费基础上的，<BR>没有做假账，且有增长潜力。<BR>只有父母亲人在外得了好处会回家与你分享。如有金融公司主动找上门来送给你好<BR>处，劝你入股接盘，千万要慎重。<BR>10.为什么金融创新对于现代金融业特别重要？主要原因是什么？<BR>（A）客户需求不断增加<BR>（B）投资者对旧东西不感兴趣<BR>（C）企业生命在于创新<BR>（D）新产品赢利空间大<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>一直到十年前，金融创新的主要目的都是为了欺宰客户。然而近年来，金融创新对<BR>于华尔街做假账越来越重要。复杂新产品出来，大家往往还不知道怎么估值，只能依靠<BR>模型，而模型参数则多由交易员自定。本是一个零和游戏，靠金融创新就可以双赢，其<BR>中至少有一方在作假。更有甚者，有时上级知道下面盈利是假，但却装不知道，以便年<BR>终跟着多拿奖金。<BR>1999年，墨西哥利率市场出现一种新产品，我们姑且叫它一年期MP（墨骗，为墨西<BR>哥骗局简称）。我与多家大行交易MP，数度亏损。市场又推出一年半MP，二年期MP等，<BR>直至五年期MP。雷曼2001年年底开始打平赢利。但奇怪的是，对手也赢利不止。<BR><BR>2003年，对手提出创新，要与我大规模交易十年期MP，我拒绝了，五年期为最长。同年<BR>年底，该大行发现了数亿美元假账。首席交易员、财务总监等多名高管被解雇。如果他<BR>们能够成功地创新，推出10年、20年MP，预支以后的利润，填补今日之亏损，双赢的游<BR>戏还可以继续下去。<BR>华尔街比MP复杂十倍的金融创新比比皆是，每个创新产品一出来都是交易双方双赢<BR>。甚至连政府也卷入了金融创新。十多年前新泽西州财政有困难，华尔街进来帮了个忙<BR>，设计了一个衍生物交易，结果三赢：州民少交税，政府加福利，华尔街赚佣金。如今<BR>恶果已出来了，现任州长科山（Jon　Corzine）曾是高盛总裁，看了华尔街给新泽西政<BR>府做的交易后，故作愤慨之态，现在要加税，同时可能状告两家做这个交易的公司。当<BR>然，可能这两家公司会再“创新”一次，帮州长找出三赢、四赢、人人都赢的办法。<BR>透支子孙未来而欠下的债务，需精心打包，贴上“AAA”，再转手他人。也可以说<BR>，金融创新的成功，离不开善良无辜而又过于轻信的投资者。<BR>11.QDII基金出海投资，为何受到重挫？<BR>（A）我们的数据、计算机及通讯设备不好<BR>（B）我们的分析师、操盘手奖金太少<BR>（C）我们虽然花了近十亿美元请美国“投资顾问”，但应花更多的钱，请更高档<BR>的顾问<BR>（D）我们运气不好，碰上熊市<BR>（E）都不是<BR>江平：E<BR>QDII投资者看到中国股市大涨，钱来得快，以为外国赚钱更容易。其实是不管哪里<BR>，赚钱都不容易。我2007年9月份与投资者交流时，提出争取做到人民币长期回报10%左<BR>右，竟无一人响应，可见投资者有不切实际的期待。<BR>我们的计算机及通讯设备是一流的。我们聘请的QDII基金经理、分析师等工资奖金<BR>也基本与国际接轨，聘到的人总体水平并不在美国基金管理人之下。说运气不好也不对<BR>：经过去年7月、8月次级信贷危机后，全球也有不少优质资产，甚至出现了一些风险较<BR>小、相对回报较高的保值“天堂”。<BR>从投资战略来看，主攻新兴市场股票是个错误选择。中国海外资产布局重仓在发达<BR>国家债券与新兴国家股票，我们必须检讨其合理性。<BR>然而QDII最大的失误是战术失误。在QDII出师之前，我们将所有想做的事情，本该<BR>像军事机密一样严守的东西都告诉别人了，甚至连具体进什么股、进多少可能也已经“<BR>请教”过美国顾问了。华尔街本在做空H股，但在我们将QDII方案和盘托出后，他们决<BR>定将H股大幅拉升，卖给QDII经理及其他投资者，然后再行打压。<BR>中国资本走出国门是我们必须迈出的一步。但是，必须有自己的子弟兵，必须像上<BR>战场一样慎重对待。]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:44:29 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:273815</guid></item><item><title>请教哪些ETF是空大盘指数的 - 北美 股市期货预测 - 九号胡同 - Powered by Discuz!</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/273903</link><description><![CDATA[<DIV ID="post_401595"><TABLE SUMMARY="pid401595" ID="pid401595" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING=""><TBODY><TR><TD CLASS="postcontent"><DIV CLASS="defaultpost"><DIV CLASS="postmessage"><DIV CLASS="t_msgfontfix"><TABLE CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING=""><TBODY><TR><TD ID="postmessage_401595" CLASS="t_msgfont">送你一张红宝书贴在墙上。<BR><BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheet1.pdf">http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheet1.pdf</A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV><DIV ID="post_rate_div_401595"></DIV><DIV ID="ad_thread1_1"></DIV></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="postauthor"><TD CLASS="postcontent"><DIV CLASS="postactions"><DIV CLASS="postact s_clear"><EM><A HREF="post.php?action=reply&fid=27&tid=35647&reppost=401595&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Dtype%26amp%3Btypeid%3D11&page=1" CLASS="fastreply">回复</A> <A HREF="post.php?action=reply&fid=27&tid=35647&repquote=401595&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Dtype%26amp%3Btypeid%3D11&page=1" CLASS="repquote">引用</A></EM><P><A HREF="">TOP</A></P></DIV></DIV></TD></TR><TR CLASS="threadad"><TD CLASS="postauthor"><TD CLASS="adcontent"></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV><DIV ID="post_401599"><TABLE SUMMARY="pid401599" ID="pid401599" CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING=""><TBODY><TR><TD CLASS="postauthor"><DIV CLASS="postinfo"><A STYLE="margin-left: 20px; font-weight: 800;" HREF="space.php?uid=3544" TARGET="_blank">stockhq</A></DIV><DIV STYLE="display: none; position: absolute; margin-top: -11px;" ID="userinfo401599" CLASS="popupmenu_popup userinfopanel"><DIV CLASS="popavatar"><DIV ID="userinfo401599_ma"><UL CLASS="profile_side"><LI CLASS="pm"><A TITLE="发短消息" HREF="pm.php?action=new&uid=3544">发短消息</A></LI><LI CLASS="buddy"><A TITLE="加为好友" ID="ajax_buddy_2" TARGET="_blank" HREF="my.php?item=buddylist&newbuddyid=3544&buddysubmit=yes">加为好友</A></LI></UL></DIV><DIV CLASS="popuserinfo"><P><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="space.php?uid=3544">stockhq</A> <EM>当前离线</EM></P><DL CLASS="s_clear"><DT>UID</DT><DD>3544&nbsp;</DD><DT>帖子</DT><DD>609&nbsp;</DD><DT>精华</DT><DD>2&nbsp;</DD><DT>积分</DT><DD>629&nbsp;</DD><DT>阅读权限</DT><DD>110&nbsp;</DD><DT>在线时间</DT><DD>419 小时&nbsp;</DD><DT>注册时间</DT><DD>2008-7-10&nbsp;</DD><DT>最后登录</DT><DD>2009-3-25&nbsp;</DD></DL><DIV CLASS="imicons"><A TITLE="个人空间" TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://blog.hutong9.com/space.php?uid=3544"><IMG ALT="个人空间" SRC="images/default/home.gif"></A> <A TITLE="查看详细资料" TARGET="_blank" HREF="space.php?uid=3544"><IMG ALT="查看详细资料" SRC="images/default/userinfo.gif"></A></DIV><DIV ID="avatarfeed"><SPAN ID="threadsortswait"></DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV ID="userinfo401599_a"><DIV CLASS="avatar"><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="space.php?uid=3544"><IMG SRC="http://www.hutong9.com/ucenter/avatar.php?uid=3544&size=middle"></A></DIV><P><EM>光芒妖怪</EM></P></DIV><P><IMG ALT="Rank: 3" SRC="images/default/star_level2.gif"><IMG ALT="Rank: 3" SRC="images/default/star_level1.gif"></P><DL CLASS="profile s_clear"><DT>UID</DT><DD>3544&nbsp;</DD><DT>帖子</DT><DD>609&nbsp;</DD><DT>精华</DT><DD>2&nbsp;</DD><DT>积分</DT><DD>629&nbsp;</DD></DL></DIV></TD><TD CLASS="postcontent"><DIV CLASS="postinfo"><STRONG><A HREF="" ID="postnum401599" TITLE="复制本帖链接"><EM>3</EM><SUP>#</SUP></A></STRONG><DIV CLASS="posterinfo"><DIV CLASS="pagecontrol"><DIV CLASS="authorinfo"><IMG SRC="images/common/online_member.gif" ID="authicon401599" CLASS="authicon"> <EM ID="authorposton401599">发表于 2009-2-1 13:43</EM> | <A HREF="viewthread.php?tid=35647&page=1&authorid=3544">只看该作者</A></DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV CLASS="defaultpost"><DIV ID="ad_thread2_2"><DIV ID="ad_thread3_2"><DIV ID="ad_thread4_2"><DIV CLASS="postmessage"><DIV CLASS="t_msgfontfix"><TABLE CELLPADDING="" CELLSPACING=""><TBODY><TR><TD ID="postmessage_401599" CLASS="t_msgfont">再来一张，玩这两张上的ETF足以。<BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheetGlobal.pdf">http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheetGlobal.pdf</A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:32:10 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:273903</guid></item><item><title>ETF Commentary: Shorting Commercial Real Estate with REIT ETFs</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/274045</link><description><![CDATA[Investors can position themselves for a decline in commercial real-estate prices with the <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">ProShares Ultrashort Real Estate ETF</SPAN> (Amex: <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">SRS</SPAN>). As the Ultrashort name implies, SRS seeks investment results that correspond to twice the inverse of the daily performance of its benchmark - the <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index</SPAN>.<BR><BR>The index is not a pure play on commercial real estate or REITs, but does cover a broad base of developers, operators and owners of shopping malls, residential developments, office buildings and public storage. The top 3 components of the index as of December 31, 2007 were <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Simon Property Group Inc</SPAN> (NYSE: <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">SPG</SPAN>, shopping malls), <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">ProLogis</SPAN> (NYSE: <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">PLD</SPAN>, industrial distribution) and <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Vornado Realty Trust</SPAN> (NYSE: <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">VNO</SPAN>, office buildings).]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:36:13 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:274045</guid></item><item><title>ETN:VXX &amp;amp; VXZ</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/274047</link><description><![CDATA[Two new ETNs that offer exposure to volatility could provide an interesting tool for asset allocators who want insurance against a sudden market crash.<BR><BR>In the article <A HREF="http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/27/magazines/fortune/volatility_index_notes.fortune/index.htm">Volatility indexes offer hedge for investors</A>, <SPAN STYLE="font-style: italic;">Fortune</SPAN> reporter <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Yuval Rosenberg</SPAN> writes that the <A HREF="http://www.etfmarketpro.com/vxx-sandp-500-vix-short-term-futures-etn.html">iPath S&amp;P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (NYSE: VXX)</A> and <A HREF="http://www.etfmarketpro.com/vxz-sandp-500-vix-mid-term-futures-etn.html">iPath S&amp;P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (NYSE: VXZ)</A> enable investors to buy (or sell) the implied volatility of the S&amp;P 500.<BR><BR>Rosenberg cautions investors to consider the risks and drawbacks involved before buying the ETNs. For example, owning the VIX can provide some insurance in case of a steep market drop, but it won&#39;t appreciably help a portfolio in other times.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:52:15 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:274047</guid></item><item><title>3x bull: ERX,EDC</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/274048</link><description><![CDATA[<P>They’re structured into bear shares - 3X the losses - and bull shares 3X the gain - and two stand out for me, namely the Direxion Energy Bull (ERX) and the Direxion Emerging Markets Bull (EDC).</P><P>Its important that you understand what’s going on with these products, namely that you’re getting three times the daily return of the underlying index (the MSCI EM index and the Russell 1000 Energy Index which tracks the large oil companies). These ETFs will give you some proxy of the long term returns from these underlying indices but they’ll be hugely affected by day based volatility.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:58:12 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:274048</guid></item><item><title>Subprime Swindlers Reconnect to Homeowners in Scams (Update1) - Bloomberg.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/274585</link><description><![CDATA[She said her firm, Freedom Financial Solutions, could pressure lenders to stop <A HREF="/apps/quote?ticker=HOMFCLOS%3AIND">foreclosures</A> by challenging the legality of loan agreements, according to court records. Her fee: $2,500 upfront and a $2,000 monthly payment to cover legal costs. Promoting her services on the Web site Craigslist, Montero, a blond-haired, blue-eyed woman who looked like a soccer mom, became known as a foreclosure escape artist.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:48:02 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:274585</guid></item><item><title>wallstreet1929 (wallstreet1929) on Twitter</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/274608</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:04:59 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:274608</guid></item><item><title>Alarming News: Bank Losses Spreading! | Money and Markets: Free Investment Email Newsletter</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/275015</link><description><![CDATA[But first, here’s the alarming news: According to the <A HREF="http://www.occ.treas.gov/ftp/release/2009-34a.pdf">fourth quarter report</A> just released this past Friday by the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), commercial banks lost a record $3.4 billion in interest rate derivatives, or more than seven times their worst previous quarterly loss in that category.<A HREF="#footnotes"><SUP>1</SUP></A>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:30:32 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:275015</guid></item><item><title>Capital Gains Tax Rates - State by State | Real Estate Investing Brain</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/281533</link><description><![CDATA[State Capital Gains Tax Rates as of 2007]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:08:26 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:281533</guid></item><item><title>Michael B. Krause -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/284672</link><description><![CDATA[<P>Michael B. Krause is an independent trader and economics blogger based out of San Diego, CA. In a former life, he was an entrepeneur who founded and administered an Internet Service Provider during the tech boom from 1994-1999 in Cleveland, Ohio.</P><P>Any San Diego based hedge funds looking for discretionary or analytical traders with a macro view should feel free to contact him: michael[at]krausecomputer[dot]com.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:16:09 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:284672</guid></item><item><title>TBT: Basic Chart for PROSHARES TRUST - Yahoo! Finance</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/284675</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:39:02 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:284675</guid></item><item><title>New 3x Inverse &amp;amp; Leveraged Treasury ETFs Launch - Yahoo! Finance</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/284676</link><description><![CDATA[<P>The four new Direxion ETFs are:</P><UL STYLE="margin: 0pt; padding-top: 0pt; padding-bottom: 0pt; padding-left: 20px;"><LI>The Direxion Daily 10-Year Treasury Bull 3x Shares (NYSE Arca:TYD)</LI><LI>The Direxion Daily 30-Year Treasury Bull 3x Shares (NYSE Arca:TMF)</LI><LI>The Direxion Daily 10-Year Treasury Bear 3x Shares (NYSE Arca:TYO)</LI><LI>The Direxion Daily 30-Year Treasury Bear 3x Shares (NYSE Arca:TMV)</LI></UL><DIV>The short funds compete with existing products from ProShares, which offers the ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury ETF (NYSE Arca:PST) and the ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury ETF (NYSE Arca:TBT). Both of those funds provide -200% exposure to their respective benchmarks.</DIV><DIV>Both the ProShares and the new Direxion funds charge 0.95% in annual expenses.&nbsp;</DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:39:10 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:284676</guid></item><item><title>The Commercial Real Estate Sector: As The Other Shoe Drops - Be Wary Of Bank Stocks-- Page:1</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/286285</link><description><![CDATA[<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 13px;"><STRONG>Shorting Commercial Real Estate With ETFs : 3 Ways to Profit</STRONG></SPAN></P><P>You might think the best way to play this new problem for the big banks would be to short them directly, or to invest in one of a number of bank-shorting ETFs. But there are more direct ways. Here are three commercial real estate ETFs ripe for short plays and their losses for 2009:</P><UL STYLE="list-style-type: disc;"><LI><STRONG>iShares FTSE Industrial/Office Index</STRONG> (<A HREF="/symbol/FIO" TARGET="_blank" TITLE="FIO : Overview and Research">NYSE: FIO</A>) down 15.5%</LI></UL><UL STYLE="list-style-type: disc;"><LI><STRONG>Vanguard REIT Index</STRONG> (<A HREF="/symbol/VNQ" TARGET="_blank" TITLE="VNQ : Overview and Research">NYSE: VNQ</A>): down 22.2%</LI></UL><UL STYLE="list-style-type: disc;"><LI><STRONG>Dow Jones Wilshire REIT</STRONG> (<A HREF="/symbol/RWR" TARGET="_blank" TITLE="RWR : Overview and Research">NYSE: RWR</A> ): down 23.6%</LI></UL><P>Investors might also want to consider going long the <STRONG>ProShares UltraShort Real Estate</STRONG> (<A HREF="/symbol/SRS" TARGET="_blank" TITLE="SRS : Overview and Research">NYSE: SRS</A>). This seeks investment results equal to twice the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:11:05 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:286285</guid></item><item><title>So You Think You Can Invest?: Commodity ETF and ETNs</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/286286</link><description><![CDATA[<H3 CLASS="post-title entry-title"><A HREF="http://soyouthinkyoucaninvest.blogspot.com/2008/11/commodity-etf-and-etns.html">Commodity ETF and ETNs</A></H3><DIV CLASS="post-header-line-1"><DIV CLASS="post-body entry-content">I compiled a list of all the commodity ETF and ETNs available to US investors. Commodity types include precious metals, base metals, agriculture, energy and livestock. Note that I have only included those ETF and ETNs that track the commodity prices themselves, and not ETF and ETNs that track commodity based companies. Also note that I have excluded any leveraged funds as well. For some reasons why, check out <A HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/article/35789-the-case-against-leveraged-etfs">this article</A>.<BR><BR><A HREF="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pnz0rylkYw_iH4CSC5jlONA">Click here</A> to view the google docs spreadsheet of commodity ETFs and ETNs. You can edit, save or download the document to excel.</DIV></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:21:41 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:286286</guid></item><item><title>REIT ETFs | ETF MarketPro</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/286288</link><description><![CDATA[<H2>Overview of REIT ETFs</H2><P>Each of the top 3 ETF sponsors has at least one domestic REIT fund.&nbsp; International and specialty REIT ETFs are also available</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:26:07 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:286288</guid></item><item><title>Commercial Real Estate Time Bomb Ticking for REITs -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/289173</link><description><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate Time Bomb Ticking for REITs<BR><BR>SRS<BR><SPAN CLASS="content_of_comment" ID="content_of_comment_467744">RPT, PEI, CBL, SHO, are all good risk/reward investments.</SPAN>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:23:22 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:289173</guid></item><item><title>The Disciplined Investor - Book, Blog and Podcast. Financial Insight, Market News and Investments.</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/289175</link><description><![CDATA[If you have not had the opportunity to work with the <A HREF="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/finder/customstocks.asp"><STRONG>MSN Money Stock Screener</STRONG></A>, you should. It provides for a great ways to find investment ideas that could, after some research, turn up a few winners. In fact, the first]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:30:53 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:289175</guid></item><item><title>The Blog For All Investors and Traders</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/297035</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Today&#39;s Market Prediction:</SPAN><BR><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);">I will post the close (up or down) prediction of the general market about half hour after the market open so that you may use it as a clue for your day trading.</SPAN>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:39:32 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:297035</guid></item><item><title>How to use MACD as a Momentum indicator? How to understand that? - Yahoo! Answers India</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/303861</link><description><![CDATA[<DIV CLASS="content">The MACD proves most effective in wide-swinging trading markets rather than choppy, sideways markets.<BR><BR>The signal line crossing is the usual trading rule, that is to sell when the MACD falls below its signal line and on the other hand, buy when the MACD rises above its signal line.<BR><BR><A HREF="http://macd-trader.blogspot.com">http://macd-trader.blogspot.com</A> perform a daily scan of NYSE and NASDAQ to look for the pattern above.</DIV><H3 CLASS="reference">Source(s):</H3><DIV CLASS="reference"><A HREF="http://macd-trader.blogspot.com">http://macd-trader.blogspot.com</A></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:10:07 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:303861</guid></item><item><title>13 Firefox Extensions Every Investor Needs : clipclip</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/311293</link><description><![CDATA[13 Firefox Extensions Every Investor Needs]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:09:34 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:311293</guid></item><item><title>Invesco Opens Balanced Fund to Minimize Market Impact (Update1) - Bloomberg.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/325714</link><description><![CDATA[The Invesco fund, which trades under the ticker <SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">ABRZX</SPAN>, buys derivatives linked to indexes such as the Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong. It also invests in government bonds and commodities including crude oil, gold and soybean meal.<BR><BR>The fund carries an annual expense ratio for Class A shares of 1.36 percent, compared with a median of 1.15 percent for similar funds, Ryan Leggio, an analyst at Morningstar, said in an interview.<BR><BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">TUZ</SPAN> pimco ETF of 3 year bond]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:22:00 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:325714</guid></item><item><title>Municipal Bond ETFs Have Attractive Yields | ETF Trends</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/330809</link><description><![CDATA[<P>Competitive yields are suddenly giving municipal bond exchange traded funds (ETFs) a new level of attractiveness to investors.</P><P>Muni bond ETFs are the new kids on the block; the first ones didn’t appear until last September.</P><P>On Feb. 1, the <STRONG>Market Vectors Lehman Brothers AMT-Free Intermediate Municipal Index (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=itm" TARGET="_blank">ITM</A>)</STRONG> was yielding 3.49%. It targets the 6- to 16-year part of the yield curve, <A HREF="http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080211/REG/954762910/1025/ETF" TARGET="_blank">reports David Hoffman for Investment News</A>. Another bonus: the yield paid out by munis is free from federal taxation, making their effective income greater than the taxable yield offered right now by Treasury bonds.</P><P>Other comparable muni ETFs tell a similar story: the <STRONG>PowerShares Insured National Muni Bond (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=pza" TARGET="blank">PZA</A>)</STRONG> had a yield of 4.2% yield, with a tax equivalent yield of 6.46%.The <STRONG>iShares S&amp;P National Municipal Bond Fund (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=mub" TARGET="_blank">MUB</A>)</STRONG> had a yield of 3.44%, but the tax equivalent yield was 5.07%. The <STRONG>SPDR Lehman Municipal Bond ETF (<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=tfi" TARGET="_blank">TFI</A>)</STRONG> yielded 3.34%, with a tax equivalent of 5.14%.</P><P>James Colby, Van Eck’s senior municipal strategist, says muni bond ETFs are a good option for those investors uncertain about what’s going to happen in the Treasury markets. I don’t see anything wrong with this strategy, and the municipal bond ETF environment appears relatively safe.</P><P>There’s always risk, though, including with these types of bonds. That’s because the governments behind them pay companies to insure them so that ratings agencies will give them a better rating. However, these companies are at risk of defaulting because they also insured subprime mortgage-backed securities and they’re not as in sound financial shape as investors previously believed.</P><P>As a result, ratings agencies have started to downgrade bond insurers. At least one agency lost its AAA rating, <A HREF="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aM2Sgl3f3Gf0&refer=home" TARGET="_blank">reports Martin Z. Braun for Bloomberg</A>. The default rate on municipal bonds in 0.1%, but Moody’s Investors Service says state and local government debt is still tainted. The threat of more downgrades is something to watch out for.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:01:06 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:330809</guid></item><item><title>Live Discussion: The Dollar, Inflation and Protecting Your Portfolio -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/335552</link><description><![CDATA[Here in the US, the Federal Reserve and Treasury has been printing massive amounts of new money and created massive amounts of new credit. Most of this new money has gone to the banks. In turn, the banks are not lending the money, they are holding on to it in order to bolster their balance sheets. Companies are not buying new equipment and hiring workers. Very little of this new money is stimulating the economy - it is not increasing employment.<BR><BR>Some of this new money is flowing to the hands of this electorate. Rather than purchase more consumer goods, which would stimulate the economy and increase employment, some of this money is used to bolster the stock market, the commodities markets and the precious metals markets. The result is temporary financial profit inflation, which misleads people into mistakenly thinking that there is an economic recovery underway. Financial Profit Inflation is not real wealth creation.<BR><BR>All of this printing of money, and massive increase in credit will eventually lead to price inflation. Each dollar will buy less and less goods as inflation sets in. Most of the loss of purchasing power is borne by the poor and the lower middle class. Inflation destroys that wealth which is denominated in dollars – the real value of bonds, bills, notes and cash are eroded by inflation. Money markets and CDs lose their purchasing power. Pensions and salaries are also eroded by inflation.<BR><BR>Thus the combined interventions by the Treasury and Federal Reserve result in price inflation which cause a destruction of wealth.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:06:29 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:335552</guid></item><item><title>We&amp;rsquo;re Tracking the 1930s Bear Market | plan B economics</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/335554</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:26:49 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:335554</guid></item><item><title>TheBurningPlatform.com &amp;raquo; Economy &amp;raquo; YOU CAN&amp;#039;T BORROW YOUR WAY OUT OF DEBT</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/337913</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:24:33 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:337913</guid></item><item><title>美股 Solar 概要 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/338513</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: 美股 Solar 概要<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jun 24 22:45:27 2009, 美东)<BR><BR>-- Solar 面板厂商 --<BR><BR>First Solar (FSLR) : CdTe 薄膜PV, 目前处于行业领先地位. 每瓦特成本即将<BR>低于 $1.0, 目前没有哪家 Solar 厂商能做到这么低的 cost.<BR><BR>SunPower (SPWRA) : SunPower 做 c-Si PV. SunPower 在行业里做到最高的<BR>conversion efficiency.<BR><BR>Evergreen (ESLR) : Evergreen 做 c-Si PV. 但是 Evergreen 拥有自己的技术<BR>叫 String Ribbon. 这个技术提高了转换效率, 但是成本很高. 所以到目前为止<BR>Evergreen 都无法赢利.<BR><BR>Emcore (EMKR) : EMKR 做 c-Si PV, 但也有自己的绝招. EMKR 做 Lens Concentrated<BR>Solar Panel. 这个技术就是把太阳光通过透镜聚焦到PV 的表面上, 从而提高<BR>转换率. 其结果就是, 高成本, 笨又重. 但是 Emcore 本身并不只做 solar , 也做<BR>光纤.<BR><BR>Ascent Solar (ASTI) : ASTI 做 CIGS 薄膜. ASTI 把CIGS 做到塑料上, 这个是个很大<BR>的突破. 因为塑料薄膜非常适合于集成到建筑材料里. 在所有美股 Solar 里, Ascent<BR>Solar 可能是最有前途 (如果它们的产品能大规模生产的话, 目前产能 1.5M)<BR><BR>DayStar (DSTI) : DayStar 做 CIGS 薄膜. 但是 DayStar 只能做在玻璃上. DayStar<BR>以前是要做在塑料薄膜上的, 但是后来失败了, 只好做在玻璃上了. 基本上他们家的<BR>产品没有太大竞争里. 现在基本上是混吃等死了.<BR><BR>Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) : ECD 是 a-Si 这个领域的大牛. 所以他家<BR>做的是 a-Si thin-film. 但做在不锈刚基带上. 所以他家的 panel 也是 flexible<BR>and light weight.<BR><BR><BR>-- Wafer 和硅料 --<BR><BR>MEMC (WFR) : 任何搞半导体的可能都知道 Memc. 他是做半导体晶圆的大牛. 但是他们<BR>的技术优势是 IC 级 Wafer. 但 Memc 也生产 Poly silicon 原料, 包括IC 级 和<BR>Solar 级.<BR><BR>Hoku (hoku) : 主要生产 Poly Silicon 原料, 但也做其他的东西. 他们家已经没有<BR>cash 了, 所以只好停止了新的 poly plant 的扩张.<BR><BR><BR>-- Solar Installer --<BR><BR>Akeena (AKNS) : 这个是 solar installer, 不是面板产商. Installer 基本上没有什么<BR>技术.<BR><BR>Real Goods Solar (RSOL) : 和 Akeena 一样, 是 Solar Installer. 没啥好说的.<BR><BR><BR>-- Solar 生产设备厂商 --<BR><BR>GT Solar (SOLR) : GT Solar 是 Solar equipment 的厂商. 估计很多中国 solar 厂商都熟<BR>悉. 因为很多是从 GT Solar 买的设备. 比如LDK 就是买的GT SOLAR 的反应炉.<BR><BR>Applied Material (AMAT) : 这个和 solar 关系不太大. 是最大的 semi equipment 产商之一. 近年来, 看 solar 赚钱眼红. 所以也开始制造 solar equipment. 他们家的 solar 产品主要是 SunFab . 是生产 a-Si thin-film panel 的机器.<BR><BR>Amtech Systems (ASYS) : 这个也是 solar equipment 厂商. 很多人可能不熟悉. 他们<BR>家主要生产低档一些 solar 设备. 属于垃圾股, 但是是有赢利的. 炒炒可能挺好的.<BR><BR><BR>---------<BR><BR>文章保存于 EEInvestor Club :<BR><BR><A CLASS="a2" TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.mitbbs.com/club_bbsdoc/EEInvestor.html">http://www.mitbbs.com/club_bbsdoc/EEInvestor.html</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:33:12 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:338513</guid></item><item><title>Inflation-Fighting ETF Performance in 2009 -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/386676</link><description><![CDATA[<STRONG>Inflation-Fighting ETFs: How Are They Performing in 2009?</STRONG> YTD (Through 7/24/09) iShares TIPS Bond Fund (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TIP" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tip">TIP</A>) 1.34% PowerShares Dollar Bearish (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of UDN" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</A>) 4.00% PowerShares DB Total Commodity Index (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of DBC" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbc">DBC</A>) 6.89% SPDR Gold Trust (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of GLD" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</A>) 7.96% PowerShares DB Precious Metals (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of DBP" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbp">DBP</A>) 9.24% SPDR International Gov&#39;t Inflation Protected (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of WIP" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wip">WIP</A>) 10.66% PowerShares DB Base Metals (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of DBB" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbb">DBB</A>) 39.38% UltraShort 20+ Treasury (<A TITLE="More opinion and analysis of TBT" HREF="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tbt">TBT</A>) 40.98%]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:44:31 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:386676</guid></item><item><title>想再次抄底的可以看看这个 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/429697</link><description><![CDATA[标 题: 想再次抄底的可以看看这个<BR>发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jul 8 02:03:59 2009, 美东)<BR><BR>等这个指数（http://www.fxwords.com/m/mcclellan-summation-index.html）转向的时候再抄吧。。。<BR><BR>我觉得耐心不是体现在捂上，还是在等上。。。嘿嘿～～]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:50:55 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:429697</guid></item><item><title>Games of Chance: TALF, PPIP, TARP, FDIC, FASB | Sense on Cents</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/431080</link><description><![CDATA[<H3>Games of Chance: TALF, PPIP, TARP, FDIC, FASB</H3><P>Posted by Larry Doyle on April 7, 2009 2:40 pm | SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Games of Chance: TALF, PPIP, TARP, FDIC, FASB&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/04/games-of-chance-talf-ppip-tarp-fdic-fasb/&quot; });<SPAN ID="sharethis_0"><A CLASS="stbutton stico_default" TITLE="ShareThis via email, AIM, social bookmarking and networking sites, etc." HREF=""><SPAN CLASS="stbuttontext">ShareThis</SPAN></A></SPAN></P><DIV CLASS="entry"><P>In thinking about the economy, markets, and our banking system, my memory brings me back to my early days in New York. While working my way along 8th Avenue back to my apartment in Hell’s Kitchen, I would happen upon numerous versions of the classic NYC “hustle.” The shell game (also 3 card monte) was rampant in NYC in the ’80s. Mayor Giuliani cleared out this game, along with a host of other street scenes. For those not familiar with this game, there was a constant need for new players with new money to keep the game alive.</P><P>Why do these games remind me of our current banking system? The similarities are scary. Let’s access the most recent piece from John Mauldin’s&nbsp;site to “view the games.”</P><P>Mauldin’s guest, John Hussman, comments on these various “games” (TALF, PPIP, TARP, FDIC, FASB), in which taxpayers bear the brunt of the risk in the government’s engagement with financial institutions. <A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/john_mauldins_outside_the_box/archive/2009/04/06/fighting-recklessness-with-recklessness.aspx">Hussman writes</A> of the PPIP:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>this is a recipe for the insolvency of the FDIC and an attempt to bail out bank bondholders using funds that have not even been allocated by Congress. The whole plan is a bureaucratic abuse of the FDIC’s balance sheet, which exists to protect ordinary depositors, not bank bondholders.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P><SPAN ID="more-3016"></P><P>In regard to the FASB’s relaxation of the mark-to-market accounting rule for financial institutions:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>the irresponsibly rosy assumptions built into these models have been a large contributor to this near-insolvency, because they virtually ignored foreclosure risks.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Whether via the TALF, PPIP, or FDIC sales, the transferral of toxic assets to private investors will ultimately only have one outcome and that will be :</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>the public will suffer the losses that would otherwise have been properly taken by the banks’ own bondholders. You can tinker with the accounting rules all you want, and it won’t make the banks solvent. It may improve “reported” earnings for a spell, but as investors who care about the stream of future cash flows that will actually be delivered to us over time, it is clear that modifying the accounting rules doesn’t create value. It simply increases the likelihood that financial institutions will quietly go insolvent. I recognize that the accounting changes may reduce the immediate need for regulatory action, since banks will be able to pad their Tier 1 capital with false hope. But we have done nothing to abate foreclosures, and we are just about to begin a huge reset cycle for Alt-A’s and option-ARMs. As the underlying mortgages go into foreclosure, it will ultimately become impossible to argue that the toxic assets would be worth much even in an “orderly transaction.”</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P>In a slightly different version of the game - and in attempt to attract more players, if not necessarily truly new money - the government is considering allowing the sellers of toxic assets to also be buyers. How does that version of the game work? The sellers (Citi, BofA, JP Morgan, et al):</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>can put up a few percent of their own money, and swap each other’s toxic assets financed by a bewildered public suddenly bearing more than 90% of the downside risk. The “investors” in this happy “public-private partnership” keep half the upside while ordinary Americans take the downside off of their hands. Some partnership.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P>The NYC sidewalk games of chance are best played outside so we need to make sure the weather is good. In a similar fashion, for the government’s games to work it helps if the weather, that being the economy, is improving. Well, the difference between partly cloudy and partly sunny is all in how you look at it. In a similar fashion, regarding consumer spending:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>analysts have noted that year-over-year consumer spending has only declined very slightly, hailing this as evidence that economic concerns are overblown. The difficulty is that consumer spending has never declined on a year-over-year basis, except in this downturn, so that slight decline is actually the worst showing for consumer spending in the available data.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Games of chance can be fun; however, if an individual is spending money he does not have, the risks grow exponentially. To wit, Hussman summarizes:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>I have no idea how long investors will remain enthusiastic about trillion dollar band-aids and eroding the integrity of our accounting rules. I do know that at the end of the day, what matters is the long-term stream of deliverable cash flows that investors can actually expect to reach their hands. It’s exactly that consideration that makes it clear that we will sink deeper into this crisis until we observe debt restructuring on a large scale. If we don’t restructure the debt, the debt will fail, because for many borrowers, the cash flows aren’t there, and it is not possible to service the debt on existing terms.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><P>When my “old man” encouraged me to “hustle” and “take some chances,” I am not so sure this is what he had in mind.</P></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:01:12 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:431080</guid></item><item><title>Cue the Tape From 1938 - Barrons.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/431169</link><description><![CDATA[<P CLASS="verdana">To monetize this anti-horripilation (that&#39;s goose bumps, to you) trade, Douglas says investors can buy September 30 or 32.50 puts on the Chicago Board Options Exchange&#39;s Market Volatility Index (VIX) that will increase in value if the fear index declines, which it likely will if the stock market advances.</P><P CLASS="verdana">Because Mr. Market doesn&#39;t always do what he should, investors also might consider hedging the VIX position with at-the-money puts on the <SPAN CLASS="chartToolTip" ID="ataglance_stock_DWC_label"><A HREF="/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=SPY" CLASS="verdana rolloverQuote">Standard &amp; Poor&#39;s Depositary Receipts</A></SPAN> (SPY), an exchange-traded fund that tracks the Standard &amp; Poor&#39;s 500.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:16:41 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:431169</guid></item><item><title>Brian Shannon (alphatrends) on Twitter</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/431170</link><description><![CDATA[<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://chart.ly/ff3pms">http://chart.ly/ff3pms</A> $DJI - 19337-38 vs 2009 inspired by study by Larry McMillan $$]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:23:45 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:431170</guid></item><item><title>Brian Shannon (alphatrends) on Twitter</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/431171</link><description><![CDATA[working now $$ <A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.stocktwits.tv">www.stocktwits.tv</A>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:26:18 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:431171</guid></item><item><title>Flight Details</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/434698</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:11:35 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:434698</guid></item><item><title>Op-Ed Contributor - The Greenback Effect - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/437052</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:03:33 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:437052</guid></item><item><title>Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/459781</link><description><![CDATA[<FONT SIZE="3"><STRONG>Geithner&#39;s dirty little secret</STRONG></FONT><BR>By F William Engdahl<BR><BR>US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, in unveiling his long-awaited plan to put the US banking system back in order, has refused to tell the dirty little secret of the present financial crisis. By refusing to do so, he is trying to save de facto bankrupt US banks that threaten to bring the entire global system down in a new more devastating phase of wealth destruction.<BR><BR>The Geithner proposal, his so-called Public-Private Partnership Investment Program, or PPPIP, is not designed to restore a healthy lending system that would funnel credit to business and consumers. Rather it is yet another intricate scheme to pour even more hundreds of billions of dollars directly to the leading banks and Wall Street firms responsible for the current mess in world<BR> <FONT SIZE="3"><STRONG>Geithner&#39;s dirty little secret</STRONG></FONT><BR>By F William Engdahl<BR><BR>US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, in unveiling his long-awaited plan to put the US banking system back in order, has refused to tell the dirty little secret of the present financial crisis. By refusing to do so, he is trying to save de facto bankrupt US banks that threaten to bring the entire global system down in a new more devastating phase of wealth destruction.<BR><BR>The Geithner proposal, his so-called Public-Private Partnership Investment Program, or PPPIP, is not designed to restore a healthy lending system that would funnel credit to business and consumers. Rather it is yet another intricate scheme to pour even more hundreds of billions of dollars directly to the leading banks and Wall Street firms responsible for the current mess in world<BR><BR><BR>credit markets, without demanding they change their business model.<BR><BR>Yet, one might say, won&#39;t this eventually help the problem by getting the banks back to health?<BR><BR>Not the way the Barack Obama administration is proceeding. In defending his plan on US TV recently, Geithner, a protege of Henry Kissinger and before his present posting president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, argued that his intent was &quot;not to sustain weak banks at the expense of strong&quot;. Yet this is precisely what the PPPIP does. The weak banks are the five largest banks in the system.<BR><BR>The &quot;dirty little secret&quot; that Geithner is going to great degrees to obscure from the public is very simple. There are only at most perhaps five US banks that are the source of the toxic poison causing such dislocation in the world financial system. What Geithner is desperately trying to protect is that reality. The heart of the present problem, and the reason ordinary loan losses are not the problem as in prior bank crises, is a variety of exotic financial derivatives, most especially credit default swaps.<BR><BR>In the Bill Clinton administration of 2000, the Treasury secretary was Larry Summers, who had just been promoted from number two under former Goldman Sachs banker Robert Rubin to be number one when Rubin left Washington to take up the post of Citigroup vice chairman. As I describe in detail in my new book, <I>Power of Money: The Rise and Fall of the American Century</I>, to be released this summer, Summers convinced president Clinton to sign several Republican bills into law that opened the floodgates for banks to abuse their powers. The fact that the Wall Street big banks spent some US$5 billion in lobbying for these changes after 1998 was likely not lost on Clinton.<BR><BR>One significant law was the repeal of the 1933 Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, which prohibited mergers of commercial banks, insurance companies and <A ID="KonaLink0" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">brokerage</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">firms</SPAN></FONT></A> such as Merrill Lynch or Goldman Sachs. A second law backed by Treasury secretary Summers in 2000 was an obscure but deadly important <A ID="KonaLink1" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">Commodity</SPAN></FONT></A> Futures Modernization Act of 2000. That law prevented the responsible US government regulatory agency, <A ID="KonaLink2" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Commodity</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Futures</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Trading</SPAN></FONT></A> Corporation (CFTC), from having any oversight over the <A ID="KonaLink3" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">trading</SPAN></FONT></A> of financial derivatives. The new CFMA law stipulated that so-called over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives like credit default swaps, such as those involved in the AIG <A ID="KonaLink4" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">insurance</SPAN></FONT></A> disaster, (and which investor Warren Buffett once called &quot;weapons of mass financial destruction&quot;), be free from government regulation.<BR><BR>At the time Summers was busy opening the floodgates of financial abuse for the Wall Street Money Trust, his assistant was none other than Tim Geithner, the man who today is US Treasury Secretary, while Geithner&#39;s old boss, the self-same Summers, is President Obama&#39;s chief economic adviser as head of the White House Economic Council. To have Geithner and Summers responsible for cleaning up the financial mess is tantamount to putting the proverbial fox in to guard the henhouse.<BR><BR>What Geithner does not want the public to understand, his &quot;dirty little secret&quot;, is that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the passage of the <A ID="KonaLink5" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Commodity</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">Futures</SPAN></FONT></A> Modernization Act in 2000 allowed the creation of a tiny handful of banks that would virtually monopolize key parts of the global &quot;off-balance sheet&quot; or OTC derivatives issuance.<BR><BR>Today, five US banks, according to data in the just-released Federal Office of Comptroller of the Currency&#39;s Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives Activity, hold 96% of all US bank derivatives positions in terms of nominal values, and an eye-popping 81% of the total net credit risk exposure in event of default.<BR><BR>The top three are, in declining order of importance: JPMorgan Chase, which holds a staggering $88 trillion in derivatives; <A ID="KonaLink6" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">Bank</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">of</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;">America</SPAN></FONT></A> with $38 trillion, and Citibank with $32 trillion. Number four in the derivatives sweepstakes is Goldman Sachs, with a mere $30 trillion in derivatives; number five, the merged Wells Fargo-Wachovia Bank, drops dramatically in size to $5 trillion. Number six, Britain&#39;s HSBC Bank USA, has $3.7 trillion.<BR><BR>After that the size of US bank exposure to these explosive off-balance-sheet unregulated derivative obligations falls off dramatically. Continuing to pour taxpayer money into these five banks without changing their operating system, is tantamount to treating an alcoholic with unlimited free booze.<BR><BR>The government bailout of AIG, at more than $180 billion so far, has primarily gone to pay off AIG&#39;s credit default swap obligations to counterparty gamblers Goldman Sachs, Citibank, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America, the banks who believe they are &quot;too big to fail&quot;. In effect, these institutions today believe they are so large that they can dictate the policy of the federal government. Some have called it a bankers&#39; coup d&#39;etat. It definitely is not healthy.<BR><BR>Geithner and Wall Street are desperately trying to hide this dirty little secret because it would focus voter attention on real solutions. The federal government has long had laws in place to deal with insolvent banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) places the bank into receivership, its assets and liabilities are sorted out by independent audit. The irresponsible management is purged, stockholders lose and the purged bank is eventually split into smaller units and when healthy, sold to the public. The power of the five mega banks to blackmail the entire nation would thereby be cut down to size. Ooohh. Uh Huh?<BR><BR>This is what Wall Street and Geithner are frantically trying to prevent. The problem is concentrated in these five large banks. The financial cancer must be isolated and contained by a federal agency in order for the host, the real economy, to return to healthy function.<BR><BR>This is what must be put into bankruptcy receivership, or nationalization. Every hour the Obama administration delays that, and refuses to demand a full independent government audit of the true solvency or insolvency of these five or so banks, costs to the US and to the world economy will inevitably snowball as derivatives losses explode. That is pre-programmed, as a worsening economic recession mean corporate bankruptcies are rising, <A ID="KonaLink7" TARGET="undefined" CLASS="kLink" STYLE="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" HREF="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KD03Dj02.html#"><FONT STYLE="color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static;" COLOR="green"><SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">home</SPAN> <SPAN CLASS="kLink" STYLE="border-bottom: 1px solid green; color: green ! important; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; position: static; background-color: transparent;">mortgage</SPAN></FONT></A> defaults are exploding, unemployment is shooting up.<BR><BR>This is a situation that is deliberately being allowed to run out of (responsible government) control by Treasury Secretary Geithner, Summers and ultimately the president, whether or not he has taken the time to grasp what is at stake.<BR><BR>Once the five problem banks have been put into isolation by the FDIC and the Treasury, the administration must introduce legislation to immediately repeal the Larry Summers bank deregulation including restoration of Glass-Steagall and the repeal of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 that allowed the present criminal abuse of the banking trust.<BR><BR>Then serious financial reform can begin to be discussed, starting with steps to &quot;federalize&quot; the Federal Reserve and take the power of money out of the hands of private bankers such as JP Morgan Chase, Citibank or Goldman Sachs.<BR><BR><I><B>F William Engdahl</B> is author of</I> A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order; and Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation <I>(www.globalresearch.ca). His newest book,</I> Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order <I>(Third Millennium Press) is due out at end of April. He may be reached through his website,</I> www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.<BR><BR>(Copyright 2009 F William Engdahl).]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:00:28 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:459781</guid></item><item><title>Op-Ed Contributor - The Greenback Effect - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/472474</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:03:45 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:472474</guid></item><item><title>house bubble loss - Google Search</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/489807</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN CLASS="b w xsm">[PDF]</SPAN><H3 CLASS="r"><A CLASS="l" HREF="/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paecon.net%2FPAEReview%2Fissue46%2FBaker46.pdf&ei=NLqmSpffGsWhnQfHkriuBw&rct=j&q=house+bubble+loss&usg=AFQjCNEKkOhL1PIUXe8BCYdt-IDiGgSUPQ">The <EM>housing bubble</EM> and the financial crisis</A></H3><DIV CLASS="s"><SPAN CLASS="f">File Format:</SPAN> PDF/Adobe Acrobat - <A HREF="/url?url=http://docs.google.com/gview%3Fa%3Dv%26q%3Dcache:UghFqhHo7dkJ:www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue46/Baker46.pdf%2Bhouse%2Bbubble%2Bloss%26hl%3Den%26gl%3Dus&rct=j&ei=NLqmSpffGsWhnQfHkriuBw&sa=X&oi=gview&resnum=1&ct=view&q=house+bubble+loss&usg=AFQjCNGU98n8aOMGlkayq3CaZldVfyHB3A">View</A><BR>May 20, 2008 <B>...</B> <EM>loss</EM> of more than $7 trillion in <EM>housing bubble</EM> wealth (approximately $100000 per homeowner). The lost wealth is almost equal to 50 percent <B>...</B><BR><CITE>www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue46/Baker46.pdf -</CITE> <SPAN CLASS="gl"><A HREF="/search?hl=en&q=related:www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue46/Baker46.pdf">Similar</A></SPAN></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:13:07 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:489807</guid></item><item><title>吐血介绍一些 ETF..... 欢迎大家补充完善。 - 股文观止 - 九号胡同 - Powered by Discuz!</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/504208</link><description><![CDATA[胡同早就有总结<BR><BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.hutong9.com/viewthread.php?tid=31809&extra=page%3D1">http://www.hutong9.com/viewthrea ... &amp;extra=page%3D1</A><BR><BR>9.&nbsp;&nbsp;ETF list<BR><BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.proshares.com/funds?products=">http://www.proshares.com/funds?products=</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>10. Sector Tracker<BR><BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectortracker/">http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectortracker/</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>11 ETF tree<BR><BR>US ETF Tree PDF:<BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheet1.pdf">http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheet1.pdf</A><BR><BR>Global ETF Tree PDF:<BR><A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheetGlobal.pdf">http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/BespokeETFCheatSheetGlobal.pdf</A>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:41:03 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:504208</guid></item><item><title>Market Currents -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/506388</link><description><![CDATA[Salomon Brothers mortgage-bond &quot;godfather&quot; Lewis Ranieri says the system &quot;isn&#39;t fixed yet, <A TITLE="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=ao_2DxLIJHzw" HREF="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=ao_2DxLIJHzw" TARGET="_blank">it only looks like it&#39;s fixed</A>,&quot; and that commercial property value is beginning a cycle that will deal a blow to banks.<BR><BR><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><A HREF="http://Seekingalpha.com">http://Seekingalpha.com</A></SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><A HREF="http://Zerohedge.com">http://Zerohedge.com</A></SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><A HREF="http://wsj.com">http://wsj.com</A></SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><A HREF="http://gurufocus.com">http://gurufocus.com</A></SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">&nbsp;</SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: navy;">Some good blogs:</SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: navy;">&nbsp;</SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: navy;"><A HREF="http://thefundamentalview.blogspot.com/">http://thefundamentalview.blogspot.com/</A></SPAN></P><P CLASS="MsoNormal"><SPAN STYLE="color: navy;"><A HREF="http://market-ticker.denninger.net/">http://market-ticker.denninger.net/</A></SPAN></P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:02:10 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:506388</guid></item><item><title>FT Alphaville &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; Faber on China: Still right after all these years&amp;hellip;</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/514576</link><description><![CDATA[Love him or hate him - his utterings on markets and investment in general often generate controversy - Marc (aka “Dr Doom”) Faber is often proved right. In quite a few decades of punditry, Faber has called US recessions, gold rallies and the top - as well as the bottom - of many market cycles correctly. He likes to go against conventional wisdom but those who follow his advice claim it pays off, in spades. His quirky and highly entertaining monthly newsletter, GloomBoomDoom, examines trends on broad macro levels as well on more detailed levels, all in a dry, even flippant, style which occasionally dips over into an elegant rant. He summarises the September 1 issue thus:]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:06:55 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:514576</guid></item><item><title>M of A - Dear Comrades</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/514593</link><description><![CDATA[<H3>Dear Comrades</H3><P>Through Andy <A HREF="http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&sid=a.7B2SsYPdIM&refer=columnist_mukherjee">Mukherjee</A> of Bloomberg and Dr.&quot;Gloom&quot; <A HREF="http://www.gloomboomdoom.com/aboutmf/indexaboutmf.htm">Marc Faber</A> we got our hands on a transcript of a speech held at a meeting of the Central Economic Commission of the Chinese Communist Party. The speaker is unknown but is believed to be in a very high party position.</P><BLOCKQUOTE>&quot;Dear Comrades,<P>One of the next days we will publish our <A HREF="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-09/27/content_378161.htm">paper</A> on the &quot;Ruling Capacity of the Party&quot;. Let me cite three passages:</P><BLOCKQUOTE>We should always put national sovereignty and security in the first place and firmly safeguard state security.<BR>...<BR>Hostile forces are still pursuing their strategic attempts to westernize and separate our country.<BR>...<BR>We will effectively guard against and deal with various risks from the international economic field, so as to safeguard China&#39;s political, economic, cultural and information security.</BLOCKQUOTE>The US cronies at the IMF, the <A HREF="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-09/24/content_377540.htm">G-7</A> and the World Bank are putting pressure on us to loosen the peg of our Yuan to the US-Dollar. If we would do so, the US-Dollar could slowly devalue against all Asian currencies and the US economy could move back on a sustainable path. For now we do some <A HREF="http://futures.fxstreet.com/Futures/news/afx/singleNew.asp?menu=economicnews&pv_noticia=1095001413-9e32d306-06444">cheap talk</A> of planed revaluation to calm them down.<P>A week US Dollar is NOT in our interest.</P><P>The United States have fulfilled their <A HREF="http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2003/03/ma_273_01.html">long dream</A> and occupied Iraq to achieve control over Middle Eastern commodities. They are fighting our <A HREF="http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=3&article_id=7398">interests</A> in Sudan and <A HREF="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-03/19/content_316354.htm">Iran</A>. They are engaged in various <A HREF="http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/oil.cfm">Central Asian</A> countries at our north western border. They are even <A HREF="http://english.people.com.cn/200409/20/eng20040920_157632.html">selling</A> German made submarines, offensive weapons with cruise missiles, to the illegal government of our province Taiwan.</P><P>We continue actively to buy large amounts of US securities, especially treasuries, to keep the Yuan value bound to the US Dollar. We now have accumulated some US$ 500 billion in such instruments. There are three major positive effects to this:</P><UL><LI>We enable the US Federal Reserve to keep the interest rates low in spite of the huge US deficits and we thereby induce the US consumer to buy more of our goods and services.<BR></LI><LI>We make the US manufacturing and service industries uncompetitive and force them to move to Asia, teaching our workers the skills we will need in the future.<BR></LI><LI>We make imports to our country expansive and induce our people to save and to invest their money into our industrial build-up.</LI></UL>There are also negative effects, like some increased inflation here. But for now we are able to control these by central administrative means.<P>There is no chance that this scheme will work into eternity. But there is a good chance that we, the Party, can determine the point in time where a break will occur. Until then we will use the accumulated dollars to build significant strategic reserves of all commodities and increase the abilities of the People&#39;s Liberation Army and especially the People&#39;s Liberation Army&#39;s <A HREF="http://www.navyleague.org/seapower/chinas_navy_today.htm">naval forces</A>.</P><P>At some point, for some reason, the US, in their quest of world domination, will threaten us - either directly through military means or indirectly through the oil lever. That will be the right moment do de-peg the Yuan, devalue the US Dollar and throw the treasuries we own onto the international markets.</P><P>US treasury rates will then increase immediately to double digit values, the US economy will falter first into recession and then into a Weimar like hyperinflationary depression.</P><P>Then we will pick up what is left over from the US empire paying the cheap price of some paper losses in our US security portfolio.</P><P>Comrades, lets work to keep the US dollar strong, very strong, for the glory of the Party and the wellbeing of the people of China.”</P></BLOCKQUOTE>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:24 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:514593</guid></item><item><title>Market Currents -- Seeking Alpha</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/529004</link><description><![CDATA[The Baltic Dry Index, often considered a leading indicator, <A TITLE="http://navigatemag.ru/" HREF="/mafne.html?source=market_currents&anew_id=33076&url=http%3A//navigatemag.ru/" TARGET="_blank">continues its decline</A>, dropping (<FONT COLOR="red">-3.2%</FONT>) for a tenth-straight day.]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:20:13 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:529004</guid></item><item><title>Guest post: The madness stops here &amp;ndash; don&amp;rsquo;t pay a VC any fees</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/540739</link><description><![CDATA[<DIV CLASS="post_header snap_nopreview"><A TITLE="Guest post: The madness stops here – don’t pay a VC any fees" HREF="http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/09/29/guest-post-the-madness-stops-here-%e2%80%93-don%e2%80%99t-pay-a-vc-any-fees/">Guest post: The madness stops here – don’t pay a VC any fees</A></DIV><DIV STYLE="padding-bottom: 8px;" CLASS="post_subheader"><DIV CLASS="excerpt_subheader_right"><UL><LI><A HREF="#comments">36 Comments</A></LI></UL><BR><P>One reason I started this column is because I see a lot of “injustices” in the VC-start-up universe, and while I’m obviously aware that we don’t work in the charity sector and that business is business — and we’re here to maximise investment returns! — I do think we should let market forces determine what’s reasonable or not for business practices and deal terms. However, this works only if entrepreneurs actually have access to experience and insight into what really has been “standard” or acceptable in the past.</P><P><SPAN ID="more-11119"></P><P>Unfortunately, a lot of things that I witness as an active member of this scene take place because entrepreneurs let them – simply because they don’t know any better. And how could they? It’s not like a VC is motivated to let them in on it… And since not many entrepreneurs brag or complain about the terms they get from VC term sheets, I realise that it’s difficult to know what’s standard or not. I’d like to be one small source of “truth”, and hopefully over time we can bring a bit of balance back into this business. First up: For early stage companies and start-ups: Don’t pay your VCs any fees.</P><P>This means:</P><P>Do not pay your VC a transaction or arrangement fee [for doing the deal]: They should pay for their own costs of doing business.</P><P>Do not pay your VC’s legal fees: If you absolutely have to, cap it so it doesn’t become unwieldy.</P><P>Do not pay your VC any non-executive directors’, advisory or consultancy fees for serving on your board or giving you advice:</P><P>Unless you’re bringing in strong revenues and turning a profit, this is just plain daylight robbery.</P><P>Aside from the fact that it just doesn’t make sense to put money into a business only to take it back out again (like, WTF?!), these fees will also be distasteful to other prospective co-investors who might otherwise take an interest in your financing round. In other words, no investor happily tags along on a deal if the lead investor is lining their own pockets with the cash.</P><P>For an early stage pre-profitable company, it doesn’t make sense to pay fees. You should choose your VC investors for the value they bring (over and beyond a bank or other sources of “dumb financing”), so it doesn’t make sense to pay “extra” for that value.</P><P>Ask The VC has a <A HREF="http://www.askthevc.com/blog/archives/2008/07/should-i-pay-my-1.php">great Q&amp;A post</A> on this from July 2008. (And by the way, Ask The VC should be a must-read for any entrepreneur, but I’m realising that it doesn’t get as much of an audience here in the UK/Europe.) Paying fees to your VCs is clearly a distasteful practise in the US, so why is it still popping up in term sheets circulating around London? Can we please not be the “seedy side of VC”-?</P><P>One reason I guess these are cropping up more and more is because of the rise of new smaller VC funds. There’s been a lot of public discussion over the past 6 months or year that the VC industry is “broken” from VCs living (fatly) off their fixed non-performance based management fees and being subsequently incented to simply raise larger and larger funds. Some examples of this discussion and ranting is <A HREF="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2009/07/08/is-vc-too-fat-and-happy/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/08/24/what-is-really-happening-to-the-venture-capital-industry/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/29/the-vc-industry-is-too-fat-and-the-exits-are-too-thin/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/08/24/what-is-really-happening-to-the-venture-capital-industry/">here</A> and <A HREF="http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1122">here</A> plus a nice aggregated listing <A HREF="http://www.angelblog.net/The_VC_Model_is_Broken.html">here</A> (handy!)</P><P>Obviously this is a simplified view – since a VC can’t possibly raise a new fund (of any size) unless it has a track record or performance to boast of. But either way, there has been a clear response to all of this fodder and we’re seeing new smaller funds emerge on the scene. And while that’s very good news, the bad news is that *some of* these smaller funds (not all, of course) – in compensating for their smaller management fees (or none at all if they are private funds) – are nickel and diming their portfolio companies instead.</P><P>I say let’s not replace one inefficient model with another.</P><BR><UL><LI><DIV>                                                                                tweetmeme_style = &#39;compact&#39;;
                                                                                tweetmeme_service = &#39;bit.ly&#39;;
                                                                                tweetmeme_url = &#39;http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/09/29/guest-post-the-madness-stops-here-%e2%80%93-don%e2%80%99t-pay-a-vc-any-fees/&#39;;
                                                                                tweetmeme_source = &#39;TCEurope&#39;;
                                                                                 </DIV></LI></UL></DIV><DIV CLASS="post_subheader_left">by <A TITLE="Posts by LondonVC" HREF="http://uk.techcrunch.com/author/londonvc/">LondonVC</A> on September 29, 2009</DIV></DIV><DIV CLASS="entry"><P><IMG CLASS="shot2" SRC="http://uk.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/londonvc.jpg"><EM>This is a guest post written by a London-based VC. For the purposes of them being able to speak plainly without jeopardising their fund or their career, I’ve allowed them to post anonymously. Why are we doing this? Well, while the startup eco-system is long in the tooth and highly developed in the US, the European scene is still a spotty, shy teenager, sometimes making a few mistakes. And as a result startups need educating. Make no mistake, <A HREF="http://twitter.com/londonvc">LondonVC</A> is a genuine VC and TechCrunch Europe has met them face to face. Over the next few weeks they are going to offer a unique insight into the VC and startup world in Europe. I hope it’s enlightening for European startups. Read and learn.</EM></P><P>One reason I started this column is because I see a lot of “injustices” in the VC-start-up universe, and while I’m obviously aware that we don’t work in the charity sector and that business is business — and we’re here to maximise investment returns! — I do think we should let market forces determine what’s reasonable or not for business practices and deal terms. However, this works only if entrepreneurs actually have access to experience and insight into what really has been “standard” or acceptable in the past.</P><P><SPAN ID="more-11119"></P><P>Unfortunately, a lot of things that I witness as an active member of this scene take place because entrepreneurs let them – simply because they don’t know any better. And how could they? It’s not like a VC is motivated to let them in on it… And since not many entrepreneurs brag or complain about the terms they get from VC term sheets, I realise that it’s difficult to know what’s standard or not. I’d like to be one small source of “truth”, and hopefully over time we can bring a bit of balance back into this business. First up: For early stage companies and start-ups: Don’t pay your VCs any fees.</P><P>This means:</P><P>Do not pay your VC a transaction or arrangement fee [for doing the deal]: They should pay for their own costs of doing business.</P><P>Do not pay your VC’s legal fees: If you absolutely have to, cap it so it doesn’t become unwieldy.</P><P>Do not pay your VC any non-executive directors’, advisory or consultancy fees for serving on your board or giving you advice:</P><P>Unless you’re bringing in strong revenues and turning a profit, this is just plain daylight robbery.</P><P>Aside from the fact that it just doesn’t make sense to put money into a business only to take it back out again (like, WTF?!), these fees will also be distasteful to other prospective co-investors who might otherwise take an interest in your financing round. In other words, no investor happily tags along on a deal if the lead investor is lining their own pockets with the cash.</P><P>For an early stage pre-profitable company, it doesn’t make sense to pay fees. You should choose your VC investors for the value they bring (over and beyond a bank or other sources of “dumb financing”), so it doesn’t make sense to pay “extra” for that value.</P><P>Ask The VC has a <A HREF="http://www.askthevc.com/blog/archives/2008/07/should-i-pay-my-1.php">great Q&amp;A post</A> on this from July 2008. (And by the way, Ask The VC should be a must-read for any entrepreneur, but I’m realising that it doesn’t get as much of an audience here in the UK/Europe.) Paying fees to your VCs is clearly a distasteful practise in the US, so why is it still popping up in term sheets circulating around London? Can we please not be the “seedy side of VC”-?</P><P>One reason I guess these are cropping up more and more is because of the rise of new smaller VC funds. There’s been a lot of public discussion over the past 6 months or year that the VC industry is “broken” from VCs living (fatly) off their fixed non-performance based management fees and being subsequently incented to simply raise larger and larger funds. Some examples of this discussion and ranting is <A HREF="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2009/07/08/is-vc-too-fat-and-happy/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/08/24/what-is-really-happening-to-the-venture-capital-industry/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/29/the-vc-industry-is-too-fat-and-the-exits-are-too-thin/">here</A>, <A HREF="http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/08/24/what-is-really-happening-to-the-venture-capital-industry/">here</A> and <A HREF="http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1122">here</A> plus a nice aggregated listing <A HREF="http://www.angelblog.net/The_VC_Model_is_Broken.html">here</A> (handy!)</P><P>Obviously this is a simplified view – since a VC can’t possibly raise a new fund (of any size) unless it has a track record or performance to boast of. But either way, there has been a clear response to all of this fodder and we’re seeing new smaller funds emerge on the scene. And while that’s very good news, the bad news is that *some of* these smaller funds (not all, of course) – in compensating for their smaller management fees (or none at all if they are private funds) – are nickel and diming their portfolio companies instead.</P><P>I say let’s not replace one inefficient model with another.</P></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:41:10 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:540739</guid></item><item><title>WAMU(Chase)-&amp;gt;招行免费汇款汇报 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/540961</link><description></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:49:09 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:540961</guid></item><item><title>Inflation-Protection Strategies Offer Investors No Guarantees - WSJ.com</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/565273</link><description><![CDATA[<P>Exchange-traded funds such as SPDR Gold Shares and related trust products such as Canada&#39;s <A CLASS="companyRollover link11unvisited" HREF="/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=GTU">Central GoldTrust</A> own physical bullion, held in secure bank vaults and regularly audited.<BR></P><P>http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=GTU&amp;t=5y&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=</P><P><BR></P><P>Others don&#39;t own physical gold and instead seek gold exposure through derivatives. <A CLASS="companyRollover link11unvisited" HREF="/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=DGL">PowerShares DB Gold</A>, for instance, tracks an index of gold-futures contracts. The risk there is that the fund faces possible counterparty woes. In a major market dislocation, not unlike the credit crisis, if investors on the opposite side of a trade fail to make good on their obligations, &quot;there is risk that the expected price change in some commodity-proxy funds won&#39;t be delivered,&quot; says QB Partners&#39; Mr. Brodsky.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:52:13 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:565273</guid></item><item><title>The demise of the dollar - Business News, Business - The Independent</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/568910</link><description><![CDATA[<P CLASS="font-null">In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning – along with China, Russia, Japan and France – to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.</P><P CLASS="font-null">Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.</P><P CLASS="font-null">The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years.</P><P CLASS="font-null"><P CLASS="font-null">The Americans, who are aware the meetings have taken place – although they have not discovered the details – are sure to fight this international cabal which will include hitherto loyal allies Japan and the Gulf Arabs. Against the background to these currency meetings, Sun Bigan, China&#39;s former special envoy to the Middle East, has warned there is a risk of deepening divisions between China and the US over influence and oil in the Middle East. &quot;Bilateral quarrels and clashes are unavoidable,&quot; he told the Asia and Africa Review. &quot;We cannot lower vigilance against hostility in the Middle East over energy interests and security.&quot;</P><P CLASS="font-null">This sounds like a dangerous prediction of a future economic war between the US and China over Middle East oil – yet again turning the region&#39;s conflicts into a battle for great power supremacy. China uses more oil incrementally than the US because its growth is less energy efficient. The transitional currency in the move away from dollars, according to Chinese banking sources, may well be gold. An indication of the huge amounts involved can be gained from the wealth of Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar who together hold an estimated $2.1 trillion in dollar reserves.</P><P CLASS="font-null">The decline of American economic power linked to the current global recession was implicitly acknowledged by the World Bank president Robert Zoellick. &quot;One of the legacies of this crisis may be a recognition of changed economic power relations,&quot; he said in Istanbul ahead of meetings this week of the IMF and World Bank. But it is China&#39;s extraordinary new financial power – along with past anger among oil-producing and oil-consuming nations at America&#39;s power to interfere in the international financial system – which has prompted the latest discussions involving the Gulf states.</P><P CLASS="font-null">Brazil has shown interest in collaborating in non-dollar oil payments, along with India. Indeed, China appears to be the most enthusiastic of all the financial powers involved, not least because of its enormous trade with the Middle East.</P><P CLASS="font-null">China imports 60 per cent of its oil, much of it from the Middle East and Russia. The Chinese have oil production concessions in Iraq – blocked by the US until this year – and since 2008 have held an $8bn agreement with Iran to develop refining capacity and gas resources. China has oil deals in Sudan (where it has substituted for US interests) and has been negotiating for oil concessions with Libya, where all such contracts are joint ventures.</P><P CLASS="font-null">Furthermore, Chinese exports to the region now account for no fewer than 10 per cent of the imports of every country in the Middle East, including a huge range of products from cars to weapon systems, food, clothes, even dolls. In a clear sign of China&#39;s growing financial muscle, the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, yesterday pleaded with Beijing to let the yuan appreciate against a sliding dollar and, by extension, loosen China&#39;s reliance on US monetary policy, to help rebalance the world economy and ease upward pressure on the euro.</P><P CLASS="font-null">Ever since the Bretton Woods agreements – the accords after the Second World War which bequeathed the architecture for the modern international financial system – America&#39;s trading partners have been left to cope with the impact of Washington&#39;s control and, in more recent years, the hegemony of the dollar as the dominant global reserve currency.</P><P CLASS="font-null">The Chinese believe, for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to stay out of the euro in order to prevent an earlier move away from the dollar. But Chinese banking sources say their discussions have gone too far to be blocked now. &quot;The Russians will eventually bring in the rouble to the basket of currencies,&quot; a prominent Hong Kong broker told The Independent. &quot;The Brits are stuck in the middle and will come into the euro. They have no choice because they won&#39;t be able to use the US dollar.&quot;</P><P CLASS="font-null">Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy fixing the US economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications of the transition from the dollar in nine years&#39; time. The current deadline for the currency transition is 2018.</P><P CLASS="font-null">The US discussed the trend briefly at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh; the Chinese Central Bank governor and other officials have been worrying aloud about the dollar for years. Their problem is that much of their national wealth is tied up in dollar assets.</P><P CLASS="font-null">&quot;These plans will change the face of international financial transactions,&quot; one Chinese banker said. &quot;America and Britain must be very worried. You will know how worried by the thunder of denials this news will generate.&quot;</P><P CLASS="font-null">Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein trumpeted his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq.</P>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:16:55 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:568910</guid></item><item><title>Inflation Watch</title><link>http://www.trailfire.com/enjoylife/marks/568975</link><description><![CDATA[<H2><A TITLE="Permanent Link to Nomura: Inflation to surge in India" HREF="http://inflationwatch.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/nomura-inflation-to-surge-in-india/">Nomura: Inflation to surge in&nbsp;India</A></H2><SMALL>October 5, 2009 by writejesse</SMALL><DIV CLASS="entry"><DIV CLASS="snap_preview"><P>Nomura forecasts big increases in consumer and wholesale prices in India, <A HREF="%20Nomura,%20whose%20inflation%20estimate%20is%20higher%20than%20the%20central%20bank%27s%20projection%20of%20around%205%20percent%20by%20end-March,%20expects%20the%20Reserve%20Bank%20of%20India%20%28RBI%29%20to%20revise%20its%20target%20in%20its%20next%20policy%20review%20on%20Oct.%2027.%20%20">Reuters reports</A>:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><P>“We believe that the economy is in the early stages of an inflation pick-up. With input cost pressures building and domestic demand in recovery mode, output prices should follow suit,” Sonal Varma, economist at Nomura, wrote…. Nomura revised its average inflation forecast for 2009/10 to 3 percent from 2 percent and for 20010/11 to 6.8 percent from 5.7 percent. It also revised its consumer price inflation estimate for 2009/10 to <STRONG>10.8 percent for FY10</STRONG> and 6.8 percent for FY11.</P></BLOCKQUOTE><BLOCKQUOTE><P>In a separate article, the <A HREF="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125438192634455499.html">Wall Street Journal</A> noted that prices are rising not only in India, but also in South Korea and Indonesia:</P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV>]]></description><category>invest</category><author>enjoylife</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:42:05 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:568975</guid></item></channel></rss>
